This browser is supported only in Windows 10 and above.


The week’s critic wrangle: “Babel,” “DoaP,” Herzog.

Posted by on

+ "Babel": Swelling with importance or self-importance, Alejandro González Iñárritu‘s "Babel" arrives in theaters and divides the critics. Reoccurring thoughts: "Babel" is like "Crash," but better. The Japanese storyline is the most compelling. The connection of the Japanese storyline to the other two is a little thin. When you try to lay out the film’s larger meaning, it’s either elusive or a little silly.

One of the fondest of the film is Slate‘s Dana Stevens, who writes that "Babel has great expectations for itself: It wants to be a movie about big ideas and big emotions at the same time. Aided by gorgeous locations and classy trappings (cinematography by Rodrigo Prieto, theme music by Gustavo Santaolalla), it succeeds for the most part." Scott Foundas at LA Weekly believes that the film is like "Crash" in that it "share[s] a similarly reductive view of human nature," but also writes that "Babel has an undeniable power, even (or perhaps especially) when it’s at its most contrived and implausible."

At the New York Times, A.O. Scott salutes the film’s power while allowing:

That the film possesses unusual aesthetic force strikes me as undeniable, but its power does not seem to be tethered to any coherent idea or narrative logic. You can feel it without ever quite believing it.

Entertainment Weekly‘s Lisa Schwarzbaum is more skeptical:

Measured in anything other than biblical cubits, the sum of Babel’s many parts turns out to be a picture that suggests Americans ought to stay home and treat their nannies better.

At Salon, Andrew O’Hehir believes that Iñárritu is "one of the purest talents to emerge in this medium since Martin Scorsese," but notes ever so nicely of "Babel"’s striving for themes of connection and isolation:

[T]he risk that "Babel" takes, in laboriously and lovingly connecting the private tragedies of four families in four different countries, is turning that observation, which may be lovely as a momentary flash of insight, into a stoned college freshman’s profound theory about the universe. Tremendous resources have been expended here so that Cate Blanchett can lie on a dirt floor and moan, while we ponder why we can’t all get along, and whether we aren’t all the same under the skin.

David Denby at the New Yorker also writes of Iñárritu’s talents, but deplores the way "he abuses his audience with a humorless fatalism and a piling up of calamities that borders on the ludicrous."

Among the scornful: David Edelstein at New York, who sighs that "Tricky storytelling is an irritant when you can’t trust the storyteller." Jim Ridley at the Village Voice calls the film "Crash rewritten by Yoda"; he finds the film’s politicking heavy-handed, but concludes that "the sentiment is less galling than the narrative contortions that put it across."

And Armond (oh, Armond) White at the New York Press calls it "Crash for hipsters," and goes on to marvel that "It’s a weird sensation to watch an American-financed movie that condemns U.S. culture and the people who produced it, yet intends those same suckers to watch it."

And in summary:

A.O. Scott: "In the end ‘Babel,’ like that tower in the book of Genesis, is a grand wreck…" And David Denby: "’Babel’ is an infuriatingly well-made disaster."


+ "Death of a President": Armond White, being ever so quotable this week, believes that Gabriel Range‘s faux-documentary depicting the assassination of President Bush "may be the ugliest movie moment ever presented to a rational public." He’s the only one who manages to be perturbed about this film, which doesn’t seems to be generated nearly as much controversy as its distributors surely hoped after its Toronto debut.

Jonathan Rosenbaum at the Chicago Reader believes the film shouldn’t been labeled a mockumentary; he finds it engages the news format more than, perhaps, the documentary form, but that it also struggles to be a thriller: "[the film] wants to function as a mindless thriller that eventually makes us think — and only after the film is over question the form that encouraged us to be mindless. These are incompatible agendas, and in the end neither is fully successful."

Andrew O’Hehir at Salon would disagree; he finds the "the tone of mournful elegy [Range] strikes here is both convincing and — believe me, I’m shocked to be writing this — moving." Entertainment Weekly‘s Owen Gleiberman similarly thinks that "Death of a President begins as a disturbingly clever stunt but concludes as a contradiction, a political nightmare of haunting banality."

But for others, that banality precisely the problem. At the Village Voice, J. Hoberman labels the film "[d]ramatically inert but a minor techno-miracle," concluding that:

Death of a President is ultimately just an exercise. There’s a far more subversive political mock-umentary coming next week. I invite President Bush, Senator Clinton, and all politicians to get down with Borat.

And A.O. Scott at the New York Times writes that the film is "in the end, neither terribly outrageous nor especially heroic; it’s a thought experiment that traffics in received ideas."


The Andromedan.
+ "The Wild Blue Yonder"
: Getting a smidgen of a release is Werner Herzog‘s "science fiction fantasy," which features documentary footage mixed in with narration by Brad Dourif, playing a stranded alien. Andrew O’Hehir at Salon declares it "Not a major Herzog work or one that will draw a large audience, but a must-see for those who suspect (as I do) that he’s one of the greatest talents now working in this medium." The New York PressArmond White, on the other hand, thinks it is "one of his very best films" and that Herzog is the savior of the documentary.

Manohla Dargis at the New York Times believes the film "works better as an experience than it does conceptually," and adds that even when images are included for their own sake, "[t]here is pleasure in such useless beauty, of course, and pleasure too in drifting with the jellyfish amid the wild blue yonder of a great filmmaker’s imagination."

And Ed Halter at the Village Voice writes that "[t]hough occasionally striking, the footage doesn’t pack the evocative punch Herzog intends, and segments that should be lyrical mind trips only result in overstretched longueurs."

Watch More

The Best Of The Last

Portlandia Goes Out With A Bang

Posted by on

The end is near. In mere days Portlandia wraps up its final season, and oh what a season it’s been. Lucky for you, you can watch the entire season right now right here and on the IFC app, including this free episode courtesy of Subaru.

But now, let’s take a moment to look back at some of the new classics Fred and Carrie have so thoughtfully bestowed upon us. (We’ll be looking back through tear-blurred eyes, but you do you.)

Couples Dinner

It’s not that being single sucks, it’s that you suck if you’re single.

Cancel it!

A sketch for anyone who has cancelled more appointments than they’ve kept. Which is everyone.

Forgotten America

This one’s a “Serial” killer…everything both right and wrong about true crime podcasts.

Wedding Planners

The only bad wedding is a boring wedding.

Disaster Hut

It’s only the end of the world if your doomsday kit doesn’t include rosé.

Catch up on Portlandia’s final episodes on demand and at

Watch More

Your Portlandia Personality Test

The New Portlandia Webseries Is Going Your Way

Posted by on

Carrie and Fred understand that although we have so much in common, we’re each so beautifully unique and different. To help us navigate those differences, Portlandia has found an easy and honest way to embrace our special selves in the form of a progressive new traffic system: a specific lane for every kind of driver. It’s all in honor of the show’s 8th and final season, and it’s all presented by Subaru.

Ready to find out who you really are? Match your personality to a lane and hop on the expressway to self-understanding.

Lane 10: Trucks Piled With Junk

Your junk is falling out of your trunk. Shake a tail light, people — this lane is for you.

Lane 33: Twins

You’re like a Gemini, but waaaay more pedestrian. Maybe you and a friend just wear the same outfits a lot. Who cares, it’s just twinning enough to make you feel special.

Lane 27: Broken Windows

Bad luck follows you around and everyone knows it. Your proverbial seat is always damp from proverbial rain. Is this the universe telling you to swallow your pride? Yes.

Lane 69: Filthy Cars

You’re all about convenience. Getting your car washed while you drive is a no-brainer.

Lane 43: Newly Divorced Singles

It’s been a while since you’ve driven alone, and you don’t know the rules of the road anymore. What’s too fast? What’s too slow? Are you sending the right signals? Don’t worry, the breakdown lane is nearby if you need it.

Still can’t find a lane to match your personality? Check out all the videos here. And see the final season of Portlandia this spring on IFC.

Watch More

Last-Minute Holiday Gift Guide

Hits from the '80s are on repeat all Christmas Eve and Day on IFC.

Posted by on
GIFs via Giphy, Photos via The Everett Collection

Watch More