This browser is supported only in Windows 10 and above.


“The film nobody wants to see.”

Posted by on

United 93.
In his intro to the Village Voice‘s Tribeca picks (some sounding a little grudging — was 40 an arbitrary goal?), J. Hoberman surveys the sprawl that is the festival’s fifth year and writes that "The festival is a triumph of branding, but has it found its niche? Like the city it celebrates, Tribeca has proven resilient, but like New York, it’s far too sprawling and abrasive to ever attain the grooviness of SXSW or the exclusivity of Telluride. Marketing—yes. Market—we’ll see." He calls the festival "the
first 9-11 memorial, and surely the most upbeat," while referring to opening night’s "United 93" as "the movie everyone I know is afraid
to see."

On that topic, there are now three early reviews out of Paul Greengrass‘ film, two positive and one not. In a measured piece at the Voice, Dennis Lim calls it "at once scrupulous and ghoulish, visceral and sober," and "best understood as a memorial," though he does write that

‘United 93"’s claim to authority is precisely its biggest problem. Greengrass has been grandiose in his public statements: The film aims to arrive at "a believable truth" and may even reveal "the DNA of our times." Its quasi-vérité suggests an implicit fidelity, when what’s in operation is at best imaginative empathy and at worst arrogance, an obviously untenable assertion that this is how it happened.

He seems to be looking at the film with a bit of remove, but it’s still an undeniable recommendation. Less reserved is Entertainment Weekly‘s Lisa Schwarzbaum, who concludes:

Do we need to see this? No. There’s no right or wrong way to remember
9/11, no shame in skipping the movie-fied sight or prize for those who
dare to look. Do we benefit from recognizing, in United 93, that
there’s no difference between those who died and us, in fear and in
courage? Absolutely.

And at The Hot Button, David Poland weighs in:

Ultimately, "United 93" leads to a dozen people fighting for their lives over about 12 minutes. Is there a message about the overall event? I don’t see it. I think that an unflinching examination of the people on that plane might have held deep secrets, even untold. I think that the impotency of the men in the air traffic control rooms around America, especially those who are supposed to have control of our protective forces, might have offered great insights.

But all I see in "United 93" is a beautifully made, well-acted, earnest, well-intended human horror show that brings an event in American history to life, though mostly as a guess.

On the wires today, Claudia Parsons gathers quotes from the family members of those who died on the flight, who seem a fairly supportive and magnanimous bunch.

At his blog, Army Archerd talks to Universal’s Ron Meyer: "And yes, he admits that the studio was ‘very careful’ not only in the telling of the story but in its advertising, that is, the trailer. ‘But everyone (at Universal) felt that this story needed to be told.’ "

And at the LA Times, Patrick Goldstein prepares to take on all comers on the "Too soon?" question:

While I respect the fact that New Yorkers in particular may see this issue in a very different light from the rest of us, I think everyone is looking at this film, made by British writer-director Paul Greengrass, through the wrong end of the telescope. Instead of asking "Is it too soon?" I wish people would say, "What took so long?"

For 4 1/2 years, not a week, perhaps even a day, has gone by without mention of Sept. 11. Our newspapers and magazines have been filled with stories, often illustrated by graphic photographs of the tragedy. Stacks of books have been written. The war on terrorism has been a central focus of our political lives. So many documentaries and TV movies have been made about 9/11 that reviewers now contrast the new offerings the way film critics compare vintage versus latter-day Scorsese films. The playing of never-before-heard tapes detailing the frantic chaos in Flight 93’s cockpit made headlines last week as jurors pondered the fate of Al Qaeda zealot Zacarias Moussaoui.

With emotions obviously still running high, it’s no wonder some people seem so wary of Hollywood weighing in on the subject. But it seems disingenuous for those of us in the media, after having exhaustively explored every possible 9/11-related nook and cranny, to suddenly express outrage or brow-furrowing concern over the specter of Hollywood finally tackling the issue. After all, Greengrass went ahead with the film only after soliciting permission from — and working closely with — the family members of the 40 crew members and passengers on the flight.

It’s been hard for us to put our ambivalence about this film into words — we haven’t seen it and doubt we will, but not out of any particular sensitivity that not enough time has passed, though we don’t buy Goldstein’s arguments that, because there have been 9/11 docs and cheesy television movies, Hollywood’s take is no big deal.

It is a big deal. It’s a feature film, a carefully scripted product with a cast that includes a few, while not famous, certainly recognizable actors. It’s fiction with a gleam of prestige, "based on true events," however well researched, and other than those made-for-TV flicks, which benefit from being in bad taste, there’s been very little in fictional literature, cinema, or television that’s directly taken on 9/11. This is untread ground, partially because of all the tough questions it raises — what is a 9/11 feature to accomplish? Is it entertainment? Is it, as Lim suggests, a memorial, capturing some idea of those midair moments in cinematic amber? Is it didactic, is it sentimental?

We have no doubt that Greengrass’ film is in somber good taste (though we do wish he would quit with the gradiose statements about it and let it stay that way). But ultimately, that’s beside the point…we’ve tried to imagine a fiction film about the events of 9/11 that we’d want to see, and we can’t. There’s just nothing there for us, nothing that filtering events through a dramatic arc and flashy editing could say that the news footage hasn’t said more eloquently.

+ The Top 40 Picks of the Tribeca Film Festival (Village Voice)
+ A Flight to Remember (Village Voice)
+ United 93 (Entertainment Weekly)
+ April 19, 2006 (The Hot Button)
+ Victims’ relatives say 9/11 film not profiteering (Reuters)
+ United on "United 93"? (
+ It’s time we looked (LA Times)

Watch More

The Best Of The Last

Portlandia Goes Out With A Bang

Posted by on

The end is near. In mere days Portlandia wraps up its final season, and oh what a season it’s been. Lucky for you, you can watch the entire season right now right here and on the IFC app, including this free episode courtesy of Subaru.

But now, let’s take a moment to look back at some of the new classics Fred and Carrie have so thoughtfully bestowed upon us. (We’ll be looking back through tear-blurred eyes, but you do you.)

Couples Dinner

It’s not that being single sucks, it’s that you suck if you’re single.

Cancel it!

A sketch for anyone who has cancelled more appointments than they’ve kept. Which is everyone.

Forgotten America

This one’s a “Serial” killer…everything both right and wrong about true crime podcasts.

Wedding Planners

The only bad wedding is a boring wedding.

Disaster Hut

It’s only the end of the world if your doomsday kit doesn’t include rosé.

Catch up on Portlandia’s final episodes on demand and at

Watch More

Your Portlandia Personality Test

The New Portlandia Webseries Is Going Your Way

Posted by on

Carrie and Fred understand that although we have so much in common, we’re each so beautifully unique and different. To help us navigate those differences, Portlandia has found an easy and honest way to embrace our special selves in the form of a progressive new traffic system: a specific lane for every kind of driver. It’s all in honor of the show’s 8th and final season, and it’s all presented by Subaru.

Ready to find out who you really are? Match your personality to a lane and hop on the expressway to self-understanding.

Lane 10: Trucks Piled With Junk

Your junk is falling out of your trunk. Shake a tail light, people — this lane is for you.

Lane 33: Twins

You’re like a Gemini, but waaaay more pedestrian. Maybe you and a friend just wear the same outfits a lot. Who cares, it’s just twinning enough to make you feel special.

Lane 27: Broken Windows

Bad luck follows you around and everyone knows it. Your proverbial seat is always damp from proverbial rain. Is this the universe telling you to swallow your pride? Yes.

Lane 69: Filthy Cars

You’re all about convenience. Getting your car washed while you drive is a no-brainer.

Lane 43: Newly Divorced Singles

It’s been a while since you’ve driven alone, and you don’t know the rules of the road anymore. What’s too fast? What’s too slow? Are you sending the right signals? Don’t worry, the breakdown lane is nearby if you need it.

Still can’t find a lane to match your personality? Check out all the videos here. And see the final season of Portlandia this spring on IFC.

Watch More

Last-Minute Holiday Gift Guide

Hits from the '80s are on repeat all Christmas Eve and Day on IFC.

Posted by on
GIFs via Giphy, Photos via The Everett Collection

Watch More