IFC.com logo

The Daily brings together all the film news you need to know, updated throughout the day.

David Hudson

The Daily is written by David Hudson -- contact him at thedaily (at) ifc dot com.

"Star Trek," JJ Abrams and Wired.

Star Trek

[Updated through 4/22]

JJ Abrams's "Star Trek," opening pretty much worldwide in two weeks, saw its premiere in London last night. It's "a hugely efficient, fast-paced reworking with a spry turn by Chris Pine as James T Kirk - reminiscent of cocky, pre-Angelina Brad Pitt - that has 24-carat star quality," finds the Guardian's Phil Hoad. In fact, overall, "What comes as the real surprise amid the multimillion-dollar storm are the gameness of the performances."

"Putting a much-loved but over-the-hill vehicle back in shape takes more than a new battery and a lick of paint," writes Ray Bennett in the Hollywood Reporter. "It demands a full-bore refit, and that's exactly what JJ Abrams has given 'Star Trek.' Paced at warp speed with spectacular action sequences rendered brilliantly and with a cast so expert that all the familiar characters are instantly identifiable, the film gives Paramount Pictures a new lease of life on its franchise."

"The past five decades have produced five television series and ten films - not all of them successful - so veteran Trekkers had no right to expect such a dazzling and beautiful rebirth," writes Debra Craine in the London Times. "Without sacrificing the majesty of Gene Roddenberry's humanitarian ideals or the humour that is Star Trek's salvation, Abrams's film is a rollicking space adventure that makes you fall in love with the original series all over again."

Yes, "it's a big, long, glossy film," writes Mark Monahan in the Telegraph. "But it's also playful, irreverent and light on its feet, and it knows exactly when to leaven the universe-rescuing with a nice nugget of humour."

"To be honest, the plot is secondary," writes Nick Curtis for the Evening Standard. "What's dazzling is the way the film-makers have taken ownership of a phenomenon."

Meantime, Abrams has edited the May issue of Wired, where he writes about the "Magic of Mystery": "People often ask me how 'Lost' is going to end. I usually tell them to ask Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, who run that series. But I always wonder, do they really want to know? And what if I did tell them? They might have an aha moment, but without context. Especially since the final episode is a year away. That is to say, the experience - the setup for a joke's punch line, the buildup to a magic trick's big flourish - is as much of a thrill as the result. There's discovery to be made and wonder to be had on the journey that not only enrich the ending but in many ways define it."

Wired: May 09But back to "Star Trek." Wired's also featuring Paul Pope and K/O's comic "When Worlds Collide: Spock Confronts the Ultimate Challenge."

And Steven Bevacqua is the first reader of this issue to "solve an extensive hidden puzzle embedded throughout the magazine," reports Dave Itzkoff in the New York Times. Besides the games and gimmicks, "Wired wanted Mr Abrams's contributions and sensibility on every page, and devoted the entire magazine to the topic of mystery as a catalyst for imagination (inspired by a lecture given by Mr Abrams at the 2007 TED conference, an annual symposium on technology, entertainment and design): there are articles about a perplexing American landmark called the Georgia Guidestones, how stage magic affects our brain chemistry and how scientists use an online game called Foldit to help determine the structure of proteins."

That lecture's an online viewing tip, by the way.

Update, 4/22: "Blasting onto the screen at warp speed and remaining there for two hours, the new and improved 'Star Trek' will transport fans to sci-fi nirvana," writes Variety's Todd McCarthy. "Faithful enough to the spirit and key particulars of Gene Roddenberry's original conception to keep its torchbearers happy but, more crucially, exciting on its own terms in a way that makes familiarity with the franchise irrelevant, JJ Abrams's smart and breathless space adventure feels like a summer blockbuster that just couldn't stay in the box another month."

[Photo: "Star Trek," Paramount Pictures, 2009]

Tags: Chris Pine, JJ Abrams, Star Trek

Comments

(Required)
(Required, not displayed)

I realize I should reserve judgment until I see the thing, and I understand they're playing characters at the beginning of The Mission, but... is it me or do these guys playing Kirk and Spock look like they're still in high school? Or, with that baby fat on Spock, junior high?

Or, as Phil Hoad might put it, pre-Demi Ashton Kuchar.

user-pic CB

JJ Abrams has no idea how Lost is going to end, and for him to pretend that there really is an ending, that him and his team of writers will be able to tie everything up, is just plain old hucksterism. The point of Lost is not to tell a story that eventually makes sense at the end; the point of Lost and all other television shows is to bring consumers to advertisers. I think sometimes people forget that television shows are nothing but the stuff that happens in between the commericals. So that's why Abrams and Co keep adding characters and storylines, because it's not how Lost ends that is most important, but that Lost continue long enough to generate acceptable ratings and make money for the network.

user-pic carl

Well personally I just watched this movie and I think it SUCKS! J.J. has gone too far Did he ever pick up a book or even watch a show about STAR TREK before he did this movie. I mean yes its got a lot of action the fight seen are greet but he doesn’t know the first thing about what STAR TREK is. Star Trek is about people and there struggle to be better. He’s made it into” WOW I hope I can kill them first” Not to mention that he changed things about the ships to just stupid designs. First the turbo lifts are behind the bridge for a reason. If people get hurt or some thing gets damaged say oh I don’t know in a space battle, medical personal and engineering crews can get to were they can help out WITHOUT CROSSING IN FRONT OF ANYONE WHO HAPPENS TO BE FIGHTING THE ENEMY SHIP It would get kind of crazy if every time some came on the bridge the captain has to say OH COULD YOU PLEASE STOP FIRING YOUR RAY GUNS AT US THIS MAN IS BLOCKING SOMEONES VEIW
Second not everyone sits at the same level as everyone else on the bridge because unlike oh say on a submarine everyone has to be able to see the view screen OH IM SORRY BUT COULD YOU MOVE YOUR HEAD could cost lives in the wrong situation. And the Vulcan ship and the Romulan ship look stupid since when did we or anyone else start using propellers’ in space. And according to Spock he came there from 128 years in the future well according to my calculations that puts him about ten years after Voyager got home so WHAT IN THE HELL IS RED MATTER

user-pic Sikis

Or, as Phil Hoad might put it, pre-Demi Ashton Kuchar.

ADVERTISEMENT
We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click here for details.