IFC.com logo

How to diss the dead.

Filed under: Controversy

Robert Altman's been dead for nearly three years, and apparently the time for politeness is over. (Hey, it's longer than Heath Ledger got).

Mitchel Zuckoff's "Robert Altman: An Oral Biography" hit shelves last Tuesday, a book built out of Altman's final interviews and the voices of his collaborators that doesn't skirt the fact that, however acclaimed he was as a filmmaker, Altman could be a real dick. Janet Maslin notes actor Michael Murphy's anecdote about how "Bob would make the best bloody mary I've ever tasted. Then he would stand up and make a speech, pretty much the same speech every night... 'No one in this room knows what this movie is about except me.'"

Reviews have been generally respectful, with exception of a blind haymaker from veteran film writer Richard Schickel at the LA Times, who spends, oh, about a paragraph of his 939-word review actually talking about the book before rambling off about how terrible Altman's movies are, and what a jerk he was to so little end. Schickel likes "McCabe & Mrs. Miller," "Nashville," "California Split" and that's it. The rest of Altman's movies are "solipsistic," like being "trapped in someone else's not-very-interesting drug haze."

The article's prompted some LA Times infighting, with filmmaker Alan Rudolph ("Afterglow," "The Secret Lives of Dentists") writing in to defend his mentor from the wrath of Schickel. "He negates Altman because of his life style. Would he dismiss Huston's drinking or Hitchcock's sexual repression as influences on their film gifts?" Furthermore: "Directors, writers and actors don't have to replicate Altman for him to have impacted their sensibilities. [...] Bob's insistence on doing things his own way was essential. It's the major struggle. And Altman won."

For all his influence, no one's ever successfully imitated Altman stylistically, or even tried. In a way, Rudolph's admirably intentioned defense does Altman a disservice: it suggests that his major legacy isn't in the work, but in paving the way for other mavericks who wanted to flip the bird to studios while taking their money. The lesson to take: when a guy like Schickel takes a book assignment for the clear purpose of being a cranky reactionary, it's really better to just let it be.

[Photo: Altman and Lindsay Lohan on the set of "A Prairie Home Companion," used without permission]

Tags: Alan Rudolph, Michael Murphy, Richard Schickel, Robert Altman, Robert Altman An Oral Biography

Comments

(Required)
(Required, not displayed)

user-pic gokinsmen

"For all his influence, no one's ever successfully imitated Altman stylistically, or even tried."

Um, Paul Thomas Anderson?

Eh, not really. Which is not to say that Anderson isn't totally reverential towards Altman (he was the back-up director on the set of A Prairie Home Companion in case Altman couldn't finish the film), and I know he's publicly said Magnolia is just a gigantic Short Cuts rip-off. But that's only true structurally; Anderson's hyper-controlled attitude towards framing and attention towards epiphanies and really stylized drama couldn't be more different. He might've learned something about working with actors, and I have no doubt his reverence is real, but you can't really see it in the movies in my opinion.

user-pic Michael Fox

Two additional and quite different movies that--whether or not one likes them--buttress Rudolph's point about Altman's influence:

Rachel Getting Married (the seemingly loosey-goosey pacing and rhythm)
Crash (the interwoven storylines)

Sure for Rachel, although the Dogme 95 influence has been much cited in terms of Demme's cuts; not as smooth as Altman's often are. And Crash is just the worst kind of lesson learned from Short Cuts.

Contributors

Vadim Rizov
Contributing Writer

Vadim Rizov

Stephen Saito
Assistant Editor

Stephen Saito

Email UsE-mail us at ifcblog (at) ifctv.com

ADVERTISEMENT

Categories

We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click here for details.