DID YOU READ

Shelf Life: “54”

030912-shelf-life-54

Posted by on

By the time I graduated from college in 1997, I had become fully obsessed with the 1970s. Certainly film was the primary conduit for my interest, but the music and fashion of that decade began to play an increasingly important part in all aspects of my life. Released in October of ’97, “Boogie Nights” became sort of the embodiment of everything that inspired me, and I ended up seeing it probably ten or more times just while it was in theaters. And when Miramax announced that they were releasing “54” in 1998, it seemed like my cinematic celebration of ‘70s hedonism would have a second chapter.

Superficially speaking, it possessed as many or more of the 1970s pop-culture hallmarks than Paul Thomas Anderson’s film did – music, clothes, and a story about the decade’s imploding decadence that was actually true. But it ultimately kind of came and went without much fanfare, not the least of which because notorious meddlers Bob and Harvey Weinstein decided to chop out some 45 minutes of original footage and then add 25 more that changed details from the plot and otherwise altered it from writer-director Marc Christopher’s original vision.

This week, Lionsgate released the film on Blu-ray in a director’s edition which doesn’t restore the original cut Christopher produced, but at least gets a little closer to what he intended. (It’s the same as previous DVD versions, but with cleaned-up picture and sound.) Does the film deserve to go down as heir apparent to “Boogie Nights” and an overlooked gem that chronicles ‘70s culture? This week’s “Shelf Life” investigates to find out.


The Facts

Released August 28, 1998, “54” was Christopher’s first feature-length film, and as indicated above, the Weinsteins took it away from him and put together a 98-minute cut that was less controversial and (intended to be) more commercial, excising details that the main character Shane (Ryan Philippe) was bisexual, and that he, Greg (Breckin Meyer) and Anita (Salma Hayek) apparently reached a happy ending all together. In any form, however, audiences responded halfheartedly, and it opened at number Four at the box office before generating a total theatrical revenue that was just shy of $18 million.

Although it was nominated for two ALMA awards, one for Salma Hayek and one for the three performers of “If You Could Read My Mind,” it also received two Razzie nominations, for Worst Actor (Ryan Philippe) and Worst Supporting Actress (Ellen Albertini Dow, who played Disco Dottie). The film currently hovers at 13 percent fresh on Rotten Tomatoes.


What Still Works

Sadly, not a whole lot. Having never seen Christopher’s original cut, which is sort of legendary but all but unavailable, it’s impossible to attest to what might have been. But this version is brisk and superficial, showcasing three actors who were coming into their own at that time without giving them enough to do, while simultaneously offering comedian Mike Myers a chance to expand his repertoire in a more serious role. Myers is actually pretty great at Steve Rubell, the proprietor of Studio 54, but the film scarcely allows him to give Rubell (as a character or actual person) much real substance; he’s a charmer and a hedonist, but he’s also a sociopathic manipulator and mercurial drug addict.

The best part of the film unquestionably is the soundtrack, which was released in two volumes and features few of the obvious staples of the era, instead choosing deep-cut disco tracks that are more authentic to the New York scene, such as Gary’s Gang’s “Keep On Dancin’.” So at the very least, if you’re uninterested in the performances or storyline, there’s still something to enjoy throughout most of the movie.


What Doesn’t Work

“54” is a backstage drama where what’s interesting is on stage. While seeing 54 through the eyes of a young bartender is a promising idea, the theatrical version of this film does almost nothing interesting with it. If Christopher had gone full-out focusing on the hedonistic abandon of the club, or shown its descent via the legal troubles Rubell faced, then there might be something worth holding onto throughout its 100-minute running time. But Shane is a vapid, uninteresting, superficially-ambitious protagonist who does nothing except experience the same big-city revelations any other smalltown rube might if he threw himself into a world of celebrity, drugs and glamor.

Meanwhile, the relationship between Greg and Anita is not just cliched, but poorly-developed: during the first half of the film, they’re adorably lovey-dovey, always telling one another they love the other and talking about the success they’re going to have once she gets her singing career underway. But inexplicably, halfway through the film, Anita becomes inescapably attracted to Shane, and then her attraction to him becomes a larger issue in which she “needs her freedom” and inspires violent jealousy from Greg. But even then, that jealousy is only explored dramatically in one scene in the entire movie, and after that nothing ever becomes of Shane and Anita’s attraction; in fact, it’s literally never even mentioned again.

Finally, there’s a subplot involving Shane and an actress on “All My Children” played by Neve Campbell. It didn’t occur to me until this time that she is absent from almost all but the last 30 minutes of the film, when Shane teaches her a lesson about whoring herself out for work – which is exactly what he’s done for almost literally the entire running time but the film seems to consider that “ambition” or otherwise excuse it. In fact, most of the gender dynamics in the film are pretty despicable; in the guise of empowerment, women characters are mostly sexual predators, but in the case of Anita or Campbell’s character, they’re well-meaning sluts whose philandering is judged much more harshly than the hookups of their male counterparts. But in terms of Campbell’s character, she’s supposed to be instrumental in Shane’s evolution as a person and a character, and she is in the film so infrequently that she leaves almost no impact at all, although to Christopher’s credit, he just makes them friends at the end rather than having them become lovers. But that doesn’t feel satisfying either.


The Verdict

“54” is a pretty terrible movie. There’s so much interesting stuff to explore about Studio 54 that this feels like a catastrophic failure, which I, like many others, gave a pass at the time of its release because it felt like the morning-after follow-up to “Boogie Nights.” That said, I would absolutely give Christopher’s original cut another shot, since apparently it includes more details about Shane’s bisexuality and offers a more substantial exploration of the world. But ultimately its “peripheral character commenting on a larger context” approach just feels all wrong, because there’s simply too much of real interest – the music, the culture, the celebrities, and time period – to waste so much screen time on a himbo and a doofus married couple, especially when you have Myers there playing Steve Rubell, whose life, experiences, obliviousness, and ultimate downfall would have – and quite frankly still could – make for an amazing film.

Does “54” still hold up for you? Tell us in the comments below or on Facebook or Twitter.

Neurotica_105_MPX-1920×1080

New Nasty

Whips, Chains and Hand Sanitizer

Turn On The Full Season Of Neurotica At IFC's Comedy Crib

Posted by on

Jenny Jaffe has a lot going on: She’s writing for Disney’s upcoming Big Hero 6: The Series, developing comedy projects with pals at Devastator Press, and she’s straddling the line between S&M and OCD as the creator and star of the sexyish new series Neurotica, which has just made its debut on IFC’s Comedy Crib. Jenny gave us some extremely intimate insight into what makes Neurotica (safely) sizzle…

IFC_CC_Neurotica_Series_Image4

IFC: How would you describe Neurotica to a fancy network executive you met in an elevator?

Jenny: Neurotica is about a plucky Dominatrix with OCD trying to save her small-town dungeon.

IFC: How would you describe Neurotica to a drunk friend of a friend you met in a bar?

Jenny: Neurotica is about a plucky Dominatrix with OCD trying to save her small-town dungeon. You’re great. We should get coffee sometime. I’m not just saying that. I know other people just say that sometimes but I really feel like we’re going to be friends, you know? Here, what’s your number, I’ll call you so you can have my number!

IFC: What’s your comedy origin story?

Jenny: Since I was a kid I’ve dealt with severe OCD and anxiety. Comedy has always been one of the ways I’ve dealt with that. I honestly just want to help make people feel happy for a few minutes at a time.

IFC: What was the genesis of Neurotica?

Jenny: I’m pretty sure it was a title-first situation. I was coming up with ideas to pitch to a production company a million years ago (this isn’t hyperbole; I am VERY old) and just wrote down “Neurotica”; then it just sort of appeared fully formed. “Neurotica? Oh it’s an over-the-top romantic comedy about a Dominatrix with OCD, of course.” And that just happened to hit the buttons of everything I’m fascinated by.

Neurotica_series_image_1

IFC: How would you describe Ivy?

Jenny: Ivy is everything I love in a comedy character – she’s tenacious, she’s confident, she’s sweet, she’s a big wonderful weirdo.

IFC: How would Ivy’s clientele describe her?

Jenny:  Open-minded, caring, excellent aim.

IFC: Why don’t more small towns have local dungeons?

Jenny: How do you know they don’t?

IFC: What are the pros and cons of joining a chain mega dungeon?

Jenny: You can use any of their locations but you’ll always forget you have a membership and in a year you’ll be like “jeez why won’t they let me just cancel?”

IFC: Mouths are gross! Why is that?

Jenny: If you had never seen a mouth before and I was like “it’s a wet flesh cave with sharp parts that lives in your face”, it would sound like Cronenberg-ian body horror. All body parts are horrifying. I’m kind of rooting for the singularity, I’d feel way better if I was just a consciousness in a cloud.

See the whole season of Neurotica right now on IFC’s Comedy Crib.

The-Craft

The ’90s Are Back

The '90s live again during IFC's weekend marathon.

Posted by on
Photo Credit: Everett Digital, Columbia Pictures

We know what you’re thinking: “Why on Earth would anyone want to reanimate the decade that gave us Haddaway, Los Del Rio, and Smash Mouth, not to mention Crystal Pepsi?”

via GIPHY

Thoughts like those are normal. After all, we tend to remember lasting psychological trauma more vividly than fleeting joy. But if you dig deep, you’ll rediscover that the ’90s gave us so much to fondly revisit. Consider the four pillars of true ’90s culture.

Boy Bands

We all pretended to hate them, but watch us come alive at a karaoke bar when “I Want It That Way” comes on. Arguably more influential than Brit Pop and Grunge put together, because hello – Justin Timberlake. He’s a legitimate cultural gem.

Man-Child Movies

Adam Sandler is just behind The Simpsons in terms of his influence on humor. Somehow his man-child schtick didn’t get old until the aughts, and his success in that arena ushered in a wave of other man-child movies from fellow ’90s comedians. RIP Chris Farley (and WTF Rob Schneider).

via GIPHY

via GIPHY

Teen Angst

In horror, dramas, comedies, and everything in between: Troubled teens! Getting into trouble! Who couldn’t relate to their First World problems, plaid flannels, and lose grasp of the internet?

Mainstream Nihilism

From the Coen Bros to Fincher to Tarantino, filmmakers on the verge of explosive popularity seemed interested in one thing: mind f*cking their audiences by putting characters in situations (and plot lines) beyond anyone’s control.

Feeling better about that walk down memory lane? Good. Enjoy the revival.

via GIPHY

And revisit some important ’90s classics all this weekend during IFC’s ’90s Marathon. Check out the full schedule here.

PL_409_MPX-1920×1080

Get Physical

DVDs are the new Vinyl

Portlandia Season 7 Now Available On Disc.

Posted by on
GIFs via Giffy

In this crazy digital age, sometimes all we really want is to reach out and touch something. Maybe that’s why so many of us are still gung-ho about owning stuff on DVD. It’s tangible. It’s real. It’s tech from a bygone era that still feels relevant, yet also kitschy and retro. It’s basically vinyl for people born after 1990.

via GIPHY

Inevitably we all have that friend whose love of the disc is so absolutely repellent that he makes the technology less appealing. “The resolution, man. The colors. You can’t get latitude like that on a download.” Go to hell, Tim.

Yes, Tim sucks, and you don’t want to be like Tim, but maybe he’s onto something and DVD is still the future. Here are some benefits that go beyond touch.

It’s Decor and Decorum

With DVDs and a handsome bookshelf you can show off your great taste in film and television without showing off your search history. Good for first dates, dinner parties, family reunions, etc.

via GIPHY

Forget Public Wifi

Warm up that optical drive. No more awkwardly streaming episodes on shady free wifi!

via GIPHY

Inter-not

Internet service goes down. It happens all the time. It could happen right now. Then what? Without a DVD on hand you’ll be forced to make eye contact with your friends and family. Or worse – conversation.

via GIPHY

Self Defense

You can’t throw a download like a ninja star. Think about it.

via GIPHY

If you’d like to experience the benefits DVD ownership yourself, Portlandia Season 7 is now available on DVD and Blue-Ray.