DID YOU READ

“Hangover” series to climax with third installment

032312-hangover-3-final

Posted by on

We loved the first “Hangover” film, with the unstoppable rise of Bradley Cooper counteracted by the one-two punch of Zach Galifianakis getting the recognition he deserves, and a pitch-perfect Ed Helms performance. The second film stretched the feasibility that the trio could find themselves in the same dilemma, but the box office guaranteed a return to the big screen. It now appears that the third night of debauchery, completely forgotten by “The Wolfpack” in “The Hangover Part III,” will be the final entry in the franchise.

After the ridiculous success of the second “Hangover” movie, it should come as a surprise to exactly no one that Warner Bros. is going for a threequel, re-teaming Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms and Zach Galifianakis with director Todd Phillips. Production on “The Hangover Part III” is scheduled to begin in September of this year, and while there aren’t any details about the story, it’s probably a safe bet that the three guys go to some event (odds are the wedding of either Galifianakis or Cooper’s characters – maybe both!), get blackout drunk and then run into Ken Jeong. Also, seeing as they were responsible for a baby and a monkey in the first and second movies, respectively, we’re expecting the Wolfpack to take in either a baby sloth or an angry honey badger this time out – maybe both!

In a press release that can be read in full over at Deadline, Phillips was quoted as saying, “We’re going to surprise a lot of people with the final chapter we have planned. It will be a fitting conclusion to our three-part opera of mayhem, despair and bad decisions.” So, maybe they all…..die?

How do you feel about the Wolfpack’s saga coming to a close in the third “Hangover” movie? Tell us in the comments below or on Facebook or Twitter.

Soap tv show

As the Spoof Turns

15 Hilarious Soap Opera Parodies

Catch the classic sitcom Soap Saturday mornings on IFC.

Posted by on
Photo Credit: Columbia Pictures Television

The soap opera is the indestructible core of television fandom. We celebrate modern series like The Wire and Breaking Bad with their ongoing storylines, but soap operas have been tangling more plot threads than a quilt for decades. Which is why pop culture enjoys parodying them so much.

Check out some of the funniest soap opera parodies below, and be sure to catch Soap Saturday mornings on IFC.

1. Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman

maryhartman

Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman was a cult hit soap parody from the mind of Norman Lear that poked daily fun at the genre with epic twists and WTF moments. The first season culminated in a perfect satire of ratings stunts, with Mary being both confined to a psychiatric facility and chosen to be part of a Nielsen ratings family.


2. IKEA Heights

ikea heights

IKEA Heights proves that the soap opera is alive and well, even if it has to be filmed undercover at a ready-to-assemble furniture store totally unaware of what’s happening. This unique webseries brought the classic formula to a new medium. Even IKEA saw the funny side — but has asked that future filmmakers apply through proper channels.


3. Fresno

fresno

When you’re parodying ’80s nighttime soaps like Dallas and Dynasty , everything about your show has to equally sumptuous. The 1986 CBS miniseries Fresno delivered with a high-powered cast (Carol Burnett, Teri Garr and more in haute couture clothes!) locked in the struggle for the survival of a raisin cartel.


4. Soap

soap

Soap was the nighttime response to daytime soap operas: a primetime skewering of everything both silly and satisfying about the source material. Plots including demonic possession and alien abduction made it a cult favorite, and necessitated the first televised “viewer discretion” disclaimer. It also broke ground for featuring one of the first gay characters on television in the form of Billy Crystal’s Jodie Dallas. Revisit (or discover for the first time) this classic sitcom every Saturday morning on IFC.


5. Too Many Cooks

cooks2

Possibly the most perfect viral video ever made, Too Many Cooks distilled almost every style of television in a single intro sequence. The soap opera elements are maybe the most hilarious, with more characters and sudden shocking twists in an intro than most TV scribes manage in an entire season.


6. Garth Marenghi’s Darkplace

darkplace

Garth Marenghi’s Darkplace was more mockery than any one medium could handle. The endless complications of Darkplace Hospital are presented as an ongoing horror soap opera with behind-the-scenes anecdotes from writer, director, star, and self-described “dreamweaver visionary” Garth Marenghi and astoundingly incompetent actor/producer Dean Learner.


7. “Attitudes and Feelings, Both Desirable and Sometimes Secretive,” MadTV

attitudes

Soap opera connoisseurs know that the most melodramatic plots are found in Korea. MADtv‘s parody Tae Do  (translation: Attitudes and Feelings, Both Desirable and Sometimes Secretive) features the struggles of mild-mannered characters with far more feelings than their souls, or subtitles, could ever cope with.


8. Twin Peaks

peaks

Twin Peaks, the twisted parody of small town soaps like Peyton Place whose own creator repeatedly insists is not a parody, has endured through pop culture since it changed television forever when it debuted in 1990. The show even had it’s own soap within in a soap called…


9. “Invitation to Love,” Twin Peaks

invitation

Twin Peaks didn’t just parody soap operas — it parodied itself parodying soap operas with the in-universe show Invitation to Love. That’s more layers of deceit and drama than most televised love triangles.


10. “As The Stomach Turns,” The Carol Burnett Show

stomach

The Carol Burnett Show poked fun at soaps with this enduring take on As The World Turns. In a case of life imitating art, one story involving demonic possession would go on to happen for “real” on Days of Our Lives.


11. Days of our Lives (Friends Edition)

joey

Still airing today, Days of Our Lives is one of the most famous soap operas of all time. They’re also excellent sports, as they allowed Friends star Joey Tribbiani to star as Dr Drake Ramoray, the only doctor to date his own stalker (while pretending to be his own evil twin). And then return after a brain-transplant.

And let’s not forget the greatest soap opera parody line ever written: “Come on Joey, you’re going up against a guy who survived his own cremation!”


12. Acorn Antiques

acorn

First appearing on the BBC sketch comedy series Victoria Wood As Seen on TV, Acorn Antiques combines almost every low-budget soap opera trope into one amazing whole. The staff of a small town antique store suffer a disproportional number of amnesiac love-triangles, while entire storylines suddenly appear and disappear without warning or resolution. Acorn Antiques was so popular, it went on to become a hit West End musical.


13. “Point Place,” That 70s Show

pointplace

In a memorable That ’70s Show episode, an unemployed Red is reduced to watching soaps all day. He becomes obsessed despite the usual Red common-sense objections (like complaining that it’s impossible to fall in love with someone in a coma). His dreams render his own life as Point Place, a melodramatic nightmare where Kitty leaves him because he’s unemployed. (Click here to see all airings of That ’70s Show on IFC.)


14. The Spoils of Babylon

spoils

Bursting from the minds of Will Ferrell and creators Andrew Steele and Matt Piedmont, The Spoils of Babylon was a spectacular parody of soap operas and epic mini-series like The Thorn Birds. Taking the parody even further, Ferrell himself played Eric Jonrosh, the author of the book on which the series was based. Jonrosh returned in The Spoils Before Dying, a jazzy murder mystery with its own share of soapy twists and turns.

spoilsdying


15. All My Children Finale, SNL

allmychildren

SNL‘s final celebration of one of the biggest soaps of all time is interrupted by a relentless series of revelations from stage managers, lighting designers, make-up artists, and more. All of whom seem to have been married to or murdered by (or both) each other.

Jay and Mark Duplass talk “Jeff, Who Lives At Home” and future projects

030812_jeff

Posted by on

Anyone who’s seen “Cyrus,” “The Puffy Chair” or “Baghead” knows that writer/director brothers Jay and Mark Duplass don’t tell run-of-the-mill stories. Their films walk the fine line between comedy and drama, and often seek to find truth in the most normal of situations.

Their new project, “Jeff, Who Lives At Home,” is no different. The movie follows two brothers, a “burnout” who lives at home named Jeff (Jason Segel) and his asshole brother Pat (Ed Helms), as they navigate through a day that seems like any other. But Jeff, who has a passionate belief in fate thanks to a love of the movie “Signs,” is convinced that this day is the culmination of his destiny. Meanwhile their mother, played by Susan Sarandon, discovers on her birthday that she has a secret admirer in her office, and struggles to discover whether she can open herself up to a new romance at her age.

IFC recently had the chance to talk to the Duplass brothers about their inspiration for “Jeff” and their experience working on the film. In the below interview, we talk casting choices, future project and the joys of having a stoner as your main character. Read on, but beware that some “Jeff” spoilers do lie ahead.

IFC: Is this film at all autobiographical in terms of the relationship between the two brothers?

JAY DUPLASS: No. I think that Mark said best recently. He was saying that Pat and Jeff are both in side of both of us. We would like the Jeff part to come out more. We’re working on that. But basically, Mark and I are sort of workaholics; we grew up in Catholic school. We kind of put our heads down and worked very, very hard, and making this film was a little bit of wish fulfillment for us, because we wish we were a lot more like Jeff. We love guys like that.

I think, for better or for worse, we inherently kind of see them as somewhat heroic. We realized that they appear to most people as just sort of like burnouts, but for us there’s this other element of them being kind of like rogue agents operating outside of the norms of society, and taking chances and hoping for bigger things in their lives. At least, the ones that we have been friends with. That’s what kind of inspired us to make the film.

IFC: What was the inspiration to tell a story from a character like Jeff’s perspective?

MARK DUPLASS: Jay and I are always interested in these sort of unlikely hero protagonists. [You] find yourself rooting for this person that you can’t believe you’re rooting for. And I guess, not to get too corny about it, but Jay and I have a deep-seated love for these kinds of people and you can very quickly write them off as just a quick stoner profile, but if you take the time to dig a little deeper, there’s a lot of hopes and dreams inside of Jeff. So, for us, it was less a conscious decision to do that and more just following our [interests] of what we’d want to see.

IFC: Where did you come up with the idea for Susan Sarandon’s storyline?

JD: Well, we always try to do something a little different, like you’re talking about with the tone that we have on Jeff. We’re obviously acknowledging that most people would reference him as a stoner, but we’re choosing to explore this other side of him, happening concurrently with all of these other characters, in this case specifically with Susan’s character. A mother character, typically in a movie, is usually used just as a counterpoint and to sort of yell at them and be angry with them. And we do a little bit of that, but we were just interested in her having this sort of sexual awakening.

I guess the theme of the movie, you know, thinking about it retrospectively, is that all of these characters are not happy, they’re stuck, and they’re trying to get to that next level. They’re trying to get to that point where they have a little bit of air and a little bit of light and a little bit of joy in their life and none of them are very good at getting there or know how to get there. For Susan’s character, we just got excited about this idea of this inter-office romance and her, not only being resistant to the romance, but also being resistant to the idea that she could even participate in something like that in this stage of her life, and … that was exciting to us.

IFC: How did you decide the actors to play each role?

MD: Jason [Segel] was the first guy we brought on board because we knew he had that wonderful everyman quality plus he’s a bit of a dreamer himself, and we knew he’d be the right fit. And then we brought on Ed [Helms], because if you’re asking someone to play a douchebag in your movie, then you have to really cast a nice person for them because when it’s time for them to turn a little bit, you have that.

But in regards to Judy [Greer], we knew absolutely we wanted her for the film mostly because she has this very [unique] quality about her which is she can be simultaneously tragic, sad and funny at the same time. And it’s very hard to watch a sweet girl like Judy cry and find yourself sympathizing with her and laughing at the same time. That’s just a real testament to the spirit of her.

IFC: Do you two have plans to work on any other movies in the future?

MD: We have a whole bunch of things right now and we’re both having kids this year, so lots of things on the horizon.

IFC: One last question for you Jay. I know Mark has been spending a lot of time acting recently, but are you ever going to make the jump in front of the camera?

JD: It’s possible that I might do something this summer. I mean, up until this point, with all the films Mark and I have made, I’m the primary camera operator, so it definitely is hard to get in front of the camera when you’re behind it. It’s kind of just been not really on our radar, not really an option up until this point. But there’s a film that someone has asked me to act in and I might do that this summer.

What are your thought on the Duplass brothers’ approach to filmmaking? Tell us in the comments section below or on Facebook and Twitter.

Ed Helms says “The Hangover 3″ is “not officially happening”

022712_edhelms

Posted by on

It shouldn’t come as any surprise that Warner Bros is gearing up to make a third installment of their “The Hangover” franchise. The first two films grossed over $1 billion worldwide, and in all likelihood a third film would do just as well.

Last we heard, the stars were negotiating salary deals so that deal making on the project can be finalized. The Hollywood Reporter said that Warner Bros was hoping have the flick start shooting this summer and be ready for a Memorial Day 2013 release date. So when IFC caught up with star Ed Helms on the Film Independent Spirit Awards red carpet, it seemed only fair to ask him if he had heard any more news on the development of “The Hangover 3.”

“‘Hangover 3′ is going to be an independent movie,” he deadpanned. “We’re making it for $12,000. It’s all actual found footage.”

Well, if it worked for “Paranormal Activity,” it just might work for “The Hangover” boys. But all joking aside, Helms did offer an actual update on the flick.

“The real answer is that there’s a lot of positive momentum and energy in that direction, but we’re not there yet. It’s not officially happening. But I’m hopeful,” he said. “I would love to do it and we’ll see. I think there’s endless stories to tell with these guys.”

The THR story said that “The Hangover 3″ intends to ditch the “forgotten-debauchery formula of the first movies” and take the series in a new direction. There will likely still be a major hangover involved, but it won’t necessarily involve main characters Stu, Phil and Alan forgetting a night’s events and then spending the rest of the movie trying to remember them.

Helms felt that is the natural direction to take the series. When asked how the next movie will deviate from the previous two, he said he can think of plenty of ways to make “The Hangover 3″ feel fresh.

“I think you have to. That’s just kind of a no brainer,” Helms said of ditching the previously-successful formula. “That’s just one story construct. How does any movie do that? There’s infinite stories to tell. I think what the audiences like is just spending time with these guys. That’s certainly what we like about doing it. We’ll see. We’ll see what happens.”

Do you want to see “The Hangover 3″? How would you want the storytelling to change from the first two films? Tell us in the comments section below or on Facebook and Twitter.

Powered by ZergNet