Famed ’70/80s director Randal Kleiser on “Getting It Right” and giving up on big-budget Hollywood films

Famed ’70/80s director Randal Kleiser on “Getting It Right” and giving up on big-budget Hollywood films (photo)

Posted by on

With the possible exception of Steven Spielberg, no 1980s filmmaker was responsible for more watershed Generation X films than Randal Kleiser: starting with “Grease” in 1978, Kleiser created a seemingly neverending series of coming-of-age films, including “Summer Lovers,” “The Blue Lagoon,” “Flight of the Navigator” and “Big Top Pee Wee,” that continue to entertain and resonate with audiences. Recently, MGM’s DVD-on-demand service released “Getting It Right,” another of the director’s films from that era, and although it was set in London and featured decidedly more R-rated content than its predecessors, it too was another tale of a young person finding his footing in an adult world.

IFC caught with Kleiser to talk about the release of “Getting It Right”; additionally, the accomplished filmmaker offered some insights into how he managed to make so many terrific, iconic ’80s films, and reflected on his history as one of Hollywood’s great purveyors of films about growing up.

This film came right after “Big Top Pee-Wee” and before “Honey I Blew Up the Kid.” Was this an especially personal film, or how did you end up doing something sort of out of left field like this?

Well, once I did “Grease,” everyone was offering me studio pictures in a similar vein – you know, popcorn movie. But when I was in USC film school in the ’60s, I saw a whole bunch of these great films from England, like Morgan, Darling, Alfie, The Knack, and they all had the same kind of feel. They were all about sort of quirky people and their relationships in swinging London, and when I read this book, “Getting It Right,” it just felt like those films. So I got this obsession of wanting to go to England and make this movie in the style of those films I’d seen in college, and I was able to get the money up and go and do it. So it was really kind of a labor of love, dream-come-true type of thing, because it was generated from something I really wanted to do and not an assignment that was given to me. And then I got this fantastic cast and it was just a great experience.

Watching it now, it feels like a predecessor to “The 40 Year Old Virgin” – maybe “The 31-Year-Old Virgin.” What did you see as the core story of the film, or what did you connect with?

Well, I’d done several coming of age stories, but the interesting thing was that guy was I think 30 in the book, and this idea that he’s trapped in his adolescence because he’s at home living with his mother who’s pushy and his father is very weak, and he goes to work every day, and he’s never had any luck with women because he’s such a nerd. It was just the idea that the way it was written, it was very funny, and I was charmed by the writing, and I just thought, wow, if I can get this on film and in the style of the ’60s movies, it will be great. Because it’s a story everyone can relate to, and everyone goes through something like this when they’re going through their adolescence, and this guy was quite delayed – and that was one reason why I thought it was funny.

This film has a real time-capsule kind of feel to it. How tough was it to faithfully capture both the feeling of the ’60s films that inspired you and the current era in which the story takes place?

I hired a production designer who had done lots of movies and knew this whole world and these characters and how they would live and what kind of props they would have in their house, decorations, and what kind of clothes they wear. I had really great people – I just hired people that knew their stuff and were English, and then I had all of the English actors who knew all of the subtleties.

For instance, Sir John Gielgud, when I worked with him that one day, he said, “this is a lower-class guy who’s trying to be upper class, right?” I said yeah, absolutely, so he said, “good – I’ve developed a little bit of an accent that shows that,” and I was just amazed to see how he threw in these little, wrong pronunciations of words to show that the guy was not as posh as he’s trying to be. So just drawing upon people, the cast and crew, and just guiding it through using my interest in this wonderful book, it was not difficult at all.

Having done many coming of age stories through your career, you’ve made many films that are now seminal to people of a certain generation. How much in retrospect is that just happenstance, and how much did those opportunities come because of the success of Grease, or even something that you had a specific affinity for?

Well, yeah, I had an affinity for that; yes, adolescence is a big time in anyone’s life, and I understood that pretty well. But because of “Grease,” these doors opened for these kinds of movies pretty easily for me. But if I wanted to do like a thriller, it would not have been easy, or a western; I was interested in all kinds of movies, but those were the ones that I could get off the ground at the time. So that’s where my career led, and the only time I went off on my own and did my own thing were “Getting It Right” and “It’s My Party” – those two films, I generated. Although I did generate “Summer Lovers,” although that was a coming of age story too.

Did you think at the time with any of them that they were going to have the longevity they do now?

No, never – I never really thought any of them were going to last. It was just that I was hoping they would make money so I could keep working – that’s all. Like I said I’d been offered studio pictures, and I came to a crossroads one time when I was doing a lot of Disney films and I wanted to break free and do something serious, and Jeff Katzenberg promised I could do one if I did “Honey, I Blew Up The Kid,” but then when I finished doing that he had left the studio, so I didn’t have a chance to do that next serious movie.

Then I was offered “George of the Jungle” and I decided that I had to make a switch, and that’s when I broke away and I did “It’s My Party” for a very, very low budget, and gave up the high budget studio films. And I’m glad I did it – it’s been great to just be independent, although it’s been much more difficult than just saying yes to studio films.

Do you have a favorite Randal Kleiser film? Let us know in the comments below or on Facebook or Twitter.

Watch More

Bro and Tell

BFFs And Night Court For Sports

Bromance and Comeuppance On Two New Comedy Crib Series

Posted by on

“Silicon Valley meets Girls meets black male educators with lots of unrealized potential.”

That’s how Carl Foreman Jr. and Anthony Gaskins categorize their new series Frank and Lamar which joins Joe Schiappa’s Sport Court in the latest wave of new series available now on IFC’s Comedy Crib. To better acquaint you with the newbies, we went right to the creators for their candid POVs. And they did not disappoint. Here are snippets of their interviews:

Frank and Lamar


IFC: How would you describe Frank and Lamar to a fancy network executive you met in an elevator?
Carl: Best bros from college live and work together teaching at a fancy Manhattan private school, valiantly trying to transition into a more mature phase of personal and professional life while clinging to their boyish ways.

IFC: And to a friend of a friend you met in a bar?
Carl: The same way, slightly less coherent.

Anthony: I’d probably speak about it with much louder volume, due to the bar which would probably be playing the new Kendrick Lamar album. I might also include additional jokes about Carl, or unrelated political tangents.

Carl: He really delights in randomly slandering me for no reason. I get him back though. Our rapport on the page, screen, and in real life, comes out of a lot of that back and forth.

IFC: In what way is Frank and Lamar a poignant series for this moment in time?
Carl: It tells a story I feel most people aren’t familiar with, having young black males teach in a very affluent white world, while never making it expressly about that either. Then in tackling their personal lives, we see these three-dimensional guys navigate a pivotal moment in time from a perspective I feel mainstream audiences tend not to see portrayed.

Anthony: I feel like Frank and Lamar continues to push the envelope within the genre by presenting interesting and non stereotypical content about people of color. The fact that this show brought together so many talented creative people, from the cast and crew to the producers, who believe in the project, makes the work that much more intentional and truthful. I also think it’s pretty incredible that we got to employ many of our friends!

Sport Court

Sport Court gavel

IFC: How would you describe Sport Court to a fancy network executive you met in an elevator?
Joe: SPORT COURT follows Judge David Linda, a circuit court judge assigned to handle an ad hoc courtroom put together to prosecute rowdy fan behavior in the basement of the Hartford Ultradome. Think an updated Night Court.

IFC: How would you describe Sport Court to drunk friend of a friend you met in a bar?
Joe: Remember when you put those firecrackers down that guy’s pants at the baseball game? It’s about a judge who works in a court in the stadium that puts you in jail right then and there. I know, you actually did spend the night in jail, but imagine you went to court right that second and didn’t have to get your brother to take off work from GameStop to take you to your hearing.

IFC: Is there a method to your madness when coming up with sports fan faux pas?
Joe: I just think of the worst things that would ruin a sporting event for everyone. Peeing in the slushy machine in open view of a crowd seemed like a good one.

IFC: Honestly now, how many of the fan transgressions are things you’ve done or thought about doing?
Joe: I’ve thought about ripping out a whole row of chairs at a theater or stadium, so I would have my own private space. I like to think of that really whenever I have to sit crammed next to lots of people. Imagine the leg room!

Check out the full seasons of Frank and Lamar and Sport Court now on IFC’s Comedy Crib.

Watch More

Millennial Wisdom

Charles Speaks For Us All

Get to know Charles, the social media whiz of Brockmire.

Posted by on

He may be an unlikely radio producer Brockmire, but Charles is #1 when it comes to delivering quips that tie a nice little bow on the absurdity of any given situation.

Charles also perfectly captures the jaded outlook of Millennials. Or at least Millennials as mythologized by marketers and news idiots. You know who you are.

Played superbly by Tyrel Jackson Williams, Charles’s quippy nuggets target just about any subject matter, from entry-level jobs in social media (“I plan on getting some experience here, then moving to New York to finally start my life.”) to the ramifications of fictional celebrity hookups (“Drake and Taylor Swift are dating! Albums y’all!”). But where he really nails the whole Millennial POV thing is when he comments on America’s second favorite past-time after type II diabetes: baseball.

Here are a few pearls.

On Baseball’s Lasting Cultural Relevance

“Baseball’s one of those old-timey things you don’t need anymore. Like cursive. Or email.”

On The Dramatic Value Of Double-Headers

“The only thing dumber than playing two boring-ass baseball games in one day is putting a two-hour delay between the boring-ass games.”

On Sartorial Tradition

“Is dressing badly just a thing for baseball, because that would explain his jacket.”

On Baseball, In A Nutshell

“Baseball is a f-cked up sport, and I want you to know it.”

Learn more about Charles in the behind-the-scenes video below.

And if you were born before the late ’80s and want to know what the kids think about Baseball, watch Brockmire Wednesdays at 10P on IFC.

Watch More

Crown Jules

Amanda Peet FTW on Brockmire

Amanda Peet brings it on Brockmire Wednesday at 10P on IFC.

Posted by on
GIFS via Giphy

On Brockmire, Jules is the unexpected yin to Jim Brockmire’s yang. Which is saying a lot, because Brockmire’s yang is way out there. Played by Amanda Peet, Jules is hard-drinking, truth-spewing, baseball-loving…everything Brockmire is, and perhaps what he never expected to encounter in another human.

“We’re the same level of functional alcoholic.”

But Jules takes that commonality and transforms it into something special: a new beginning. A new beginning for failing minor league baseball team “The Frackers”, who suddenly about-face into a winning streak; and a new beginning for Brockmire, whose life gets a jumpstart when Jules lures him back to baseball. As for herself, her unexpected connection with Brockmire gives her own life a surprising and much needed goose.

“You’re a Goddamn Disaster and you’re starting To look good to me.”

This palpable dynamic adds depth and complexity to the narrative and pushes the series far beyond expected comedy. See for yourself in this behind-the-scenes video (and brace yourself for a unforgettable description of Brockmire’s genitals)…

Want more about Amanda Peet? She’s all over the place, and has even penned a recent self-reflective piece in the New York Times.

And of course you can watch the Jim-Jules relationship hysterically unfold in new episodes of Brockmire, every Wednesday at 10PM on IFC.

Watch More
Powered by ZergNet