This browser is supported only in Windows 10 and above.


Christopher Lloyd discusses getting morbid for “Snowmen” and what it’s like playing a sage

Christopher Lloyd discusses getting morbid for “Snowmen” and what it’s like playing a sage (photo)

Posted by on

The new movie “Snowmen” — out today — might need an introduction, but one of its stars, Christopher Lloyd, certainly does not. He’s been working for decades on TV and in films, including “Taxi,” “Back to the Future,” “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?,” and countless others, contributing a singular sort of eccentricity that’s as undefinable as it is irresistible. And yet, in “Snowmen,” he plays a relatively straightforward role as a caretaker at a cemetery who offers some much-needed advice to a group of kids in the midst of dealing with such weighty issues as life, death, and doing something worth remembering.

IFC caught up with Lloyd for a discussion about his work in “Snowmen”; additionally, he talked about his legacy as an actor known for being a bit odd, and examined the challenges of living up to others’ expectations while still satisfying his own.

The story of “Snowmen” is weirdly morbid – it almost feels like an “American Beauty” for kids. What initially appealed to you about the script?

Well, I kind of liked that there is it’s almost turned into a tragedy. I like the fact that something kind of scary occurred in it; it made it go deeper in its feeling and somehow realistic. You know, things do happen sometimes among young people. And I liked a film for young people that kind of dealt with that, as opposed to something that’s maybe very sugary and safe. I like going there; I’m glad everything turns out in the story, but in the process of the story, the kids mature – something happens that makes them think more seriously about life and who they are and what kind of people they want to be. They’re not just sort of set pieces, you know? And I also felt that the places they head into also involve the parents and the family in a much deeper way than might otherwise be the case, which I felt was good to see this. It was a balance – it wasn’t just what the kids were doing and the parents are sort of putting up with it or coping with it in kind of a superficial way. It pulled everybody into it and I felt it was much more emotionally fulfilling in the long run.

Was there a sense of freedom or responsibility when playing a part where you have an important role but a limited amount of screen time?

I wanted to help these kids work things out for themselves, to find themselves, and it was a limited time, but I felt that the scene was very well written and it gave me a lot of opportunity to do that. The scene in the chapel, there’s a lot of little nuances between them and myself, and among themselves, and again, the writing really afforded this to make good choices, and real choices.

Was there more to him that was either in the script or your development of the character that we don’t see?

He’s a loner essentially. He’s taking care of things around there, but he operates alone, and I didn’t imagine him as being married and having much of a family life. I figured he lived pretty much alone and whatever kind of circumstances he’s made livable for himself, and that he’s kind of whimsical at the same time, and he’s taken in a lot of life and learned a lot. And I would like to think he has a kind of profound understanding of what life is about, and he has these young people, and he sees them struggling with their own problems at their level, and he wants to give them some sort of direction without being too explicit or authoritarian, but just by way of suggestion, kind of lead them in a direction that could help them in life.

This character is otherwise pretty normal but you’ve obviously had great success playing eccentric characters. At this point is one easier than the other, or more fun?

I don’t know. I get into a character that comes my way, and you’ve probably heard this before, but whatever character I’m playing at the moment, I get pretty obsessed with it and try to bring it to life in as many ways as I can within the confines of the material. I mean, every time I wrap on the film, whatever the size of the role, or however it was written, if I feel like I’ve given it something I fell really good about it.

How comfortable are you with that association with those sorts of roles, and how much do you feel like you’ve been able to explore enough other opportunities so that you don’t feel typecast?

Well, I’ve loved to do the things that I’ve done, and I know that’s work that I’ve done sort of brings scripts to me that are sort of similar, maybe characters that are similar. I’ve had those characters come to me that are sort of a reflection of Doc Brown or Reverend Jim, and I’m very happy to play them as long as each time, the character is something different or unique in the first place. I just don’t want to repeat what I’ve already done; on the other hand, I always yearn for, like comics want a dramatic role and dramatic actors want to be comedians.

There’s always wanting to do something that you’re not normally known for doing. Last summer I had an opportunity to do a play, “Death of a Saleman,” playing Willy Loman, and I just relished it because it’s just the antithesis of so much else that I’ve done, goofy characters or way-out characters, and here was somebody who was so real and so demanding in a very dramatic way in a brilliant play. So one way or another, I get the opportunities to do different things.

Will you catch Christopher Lloyd in anything he’s in? Speak out below or on Facebook or Twitter.


Hacked In

Funny or Die Is Taking Over

FOD TV comes to IFC every Saturday night.

Posted by on


We’ve been fans of Funny or Die since we first met The Landlord. That enduring love makes it more than logical, then, that IFC is totally cool with FOD hijacking the airwaves every Saturday night. Yes, that’s happening.

The appropriately titled FOD TV looks like something pulled from public access television in the nineties. Like lo-fi broken-antenna reception and warped VHS tapes. Equal parts WTF and UHF.

Get ready for characters including The Shirtless Painter, Long-Haired Businessmen, and Pigeon Man. They’re aptly named, but for a better sense of what’s in store, here’s a taste of ASMR with Kelly Whispers:

Watch FOD TV every Saturday night during IFC’s regularly scheduled movies.


Wicked Good

See More Evil

Stan Against Evil Season 1 is on Hulu.

Posted by on
GIFs via Giphy

Okay, so you missed the entire first season of Stan Against Evil. There’s no shame in that, per se. But here’s the thing: Season 2 is just around the corner and you don’t want to lag behind. After all, Season 1 had some critical character development, not to mention countless plot twists, and a breathless finale cliffhanger that’s been begging for resolution since last fall. It also had this:


The good news is that you can catch up right now on Hulu. Phew. But if you aren’t streaming yet, here’s a basic primer…

Willards Mill Is Evil

Stan spent his whole career as sheriff oblivious to the fact that his town has a nasty curse. Mostly because his recently-deceased wife was secretly killing demons and keeping Stan alive.

Demons Really Want To Kill Stan

The curse on Willards Mill stipulates that damned souls must hunt and kill each and every town sheriff, or “constable.” Oh, and these demons are shockingly creative.


They Also Want To Kill Evie

Why? Because Evie’s a sheriff too, and the curse on Willard’s Mill doesn’t have a “one at a time” clause. Bummer, Evie.

Stan and Evie Must Work Together

Beating the curse will take two, baby, but that’s easier said than done because Stan doesn’t always seem to give a damn. Damn!


Beware of Goats

It goes without saying for anyone who’s seen the show: If you know that ancient evil wants to kill you, be wary of anything that has cloven feet.


Season 2 Is Lurking

Scary new things are slouching towards Willards Mill. An impending darkness descending on Stan, Evie and their cohort – eviler evil, more demony demons, and whatnot. And if Stan wants to survive, he’ll have to get even Stanlier.

Stan Against Evil Season 1 is now streaming right now on Hulu.



Reminders that the ’90s were a thing

"The Place We Live" is available for a Jessie Spano-level binge on Comedy Crib.

Posted by on
GIFs via Giphy

Unless you stopped paying attention to the world at large in 1989, you are of course aware that the ’90s are having their pop cultural second coming. Nobody is more acutely aware of this than Dara Katz and Betsy Kenney, two comedians who met doing improv comedy and have just made their Comedy Crib debut with the hilarious ’90s TV throwback series, The Place We Live.

IFC: How would you describe “The Place We Live” to a fancy network executive you just met in an elevator?

Dara: It’s everything you loved–or loved to hate—from Melrose Place and 90210 but condensed to five minutes, funny (on purpose) and totally absurd.

IFC: How would you describe “The Place We Live” to a drunk friend of a friend you met in a bar?

Betsy: “Hey Todd, why don’t you have a sip of water. Also, I think you’ll love The Place We Live because everyone has issues…just like you, Todd.”


IFC: When you were living through the ’90s, did you think it was television’s golden age or the pop culture apocalypse?

Betsy: I wasn’t sure I knew what it was, I just knew I loved it!

Dara: Same. Was just happy that my parents let me watch. But looking back, the ’90s honored The Teen. And for that, it’s the golden age of pop culture. 

IFC: Which ’90s shows did you mine for the series, and why?

Betsy: Melrose and 90210 for the most part. If you watch an episode of either of those shows you’ll see they’re a comedic gold mine. In one single episode, they cover serious crimes, drug problems, sex and working in a law firm and/or gallery, all while being young, hot and skinny.

Dara: And almost any series we were watching in the ’90s, Full House, Saved By the Bell, My So Called Life has very similar themes, archetypes and really stupid-intense drama. We took from a lot of places. 


IFC: How would you describe each of the show’s characters in terms of their ’90s TV stereotype?

Dara: Autumn (Sunita Mani) is the femme fatale. Robin (Dara Katz) is the book worm (because she wears glasses). Candace (Betsy Kenney) is Corey’s twin and gives great advice and has really great hair. Corey (Casey Jost) is the boy next door/popular guy. Candace and Corey’s parents decided to live in a car so the gang can live in their house. 
Lee (Jonathan Braylock) is the jock.

IFC: Why do you think the world is ready for this series?

Dara: Because everyone’s feeling major ’90s nostalgia right now, and this is that, on steroids while also being a totally new, silly thing.

Delight in the whole season of The Place We Live right now on IFC’s Comedy Crib. It’ll take you back in all the right ways.