DID YOU READ

“Friends With Benefits,” reviewed

“Friends With Benefits,” reviewed (photo)

Posted by on

The characters in the romantic comedy “Friends With Benefits” like to watch romantic comedies. Well, technically they don’t really seem to like them all that much. Mostly they like to complain about them, and anyone who’s endured a bad romantic comedy in the last few years will recognize their issues: they’re lame, tedious, and above all, inauthentic. The people aren’t real, their problems aren’t real, their dialogue isn’t real, and they’re invariably hanging out in a tax-break-offering approximation of whatever city they’re supposed to live in.

But despite her frustration with the genre, Jamie (Mila Kunis) keeps watching rom-coms. So do a lot of us, in the hope that once in a while we’ll get a good one like “Friends With Benefits.” True, the film doesn’t quite live up its own ideals; though it actively campaigns against artificiality in romantic comedies, it isn’t always a model of verite filmmaking. Jamie meets her man Dylan (Justin Timberlake) in a classic (i.e. illogical and forced) rom-com meet cute and many of the other cliches of the genre are trotted out, albeit with a little less dust and a little more self-referentiality. The movie definitely has its cake and eats it too. But when that cake is filled with the sweetness of Timberlake and Kunis and tart grace notes from an excellent supporting cast that includes Patricia Clarkson and Richard Jenkins, you don’t mind eating a slice or two.

Jamie is a corporate head-hunter who recruits Dylan from his gig at a popular Los Angeles blog to move to New York City to work as the art director of GQ magazine. They’ve both just been dumped by their significant others but Dylan is still a little skeptical about uprooting his whole life. He shouldn’t be, though, since the art director of GQ apparently makes enough money to afford an amazing pre-furnished one bedroom apartment in Manhattan that would go for at least $3,000 a month (a flourishing magazine industry with lots of available and insanely lucrative jobs? Like I was saying: not as authentic as advertised).

After a charming nighttime tour of New York City’s sights with Jamie, Dylan decides to take the job. Once he moves east, the two strike up a friendship and then, one night after watching a particularly wretched romantic comedy, they decide to test the boundaries of that friendship by adding sex into the mix. Just sex, though, without its typical requisite emotional entanglements. After swearing on a iPad Bible app, they dive into bed for a series of love scenes that are refreshingly filthy, at least by the standards of mainstream Hollywood comedies. While the movie hews much closer to the rules of romantic comedies than it would like to admit, its stars have have honest-to-God movie star chemistry together, and their scenes sparkle with warmth, humor, and sex appeal. Even if the movie around them is less real than it aspires to be, the connection between the two leads feels totally genuine.

The director and co-writer of the film is Will Gluck, whose last film, “Easy A,” was one of the best mainstream comedies in years. “Friends With Benefits” isn’t quite up to that level — not as clever, not as well-written, and a whole lot more predictable — but it’s an utterly charming date night movie. Gluck’s got an obvious rapport with actors and he never makes the mistake that a lot of bad rom-com directors do: talking down to his audience. He’s also got an unappreciated knack for portraying child-parent relationships onscreen. A lot of the best stuff in “Easy A” was between Emma Stone’s Olive and her mom and dad, Patricia Clarkson and Stanley Tucci. Clarkson returns here as Kunis’ man-hungry single mom, and steals every scene she’s in (not an easy task, given the intense wattage of the star she’s stealing from). Best of all is Richard Jenkins, who has an even smaller and even more powerful role as Dylan’s ill father. His moments with Timberlake, particularly one in an airport, are so sad and moving they probably belongs in another, more serious movie. But they’re so damn good, I’m glad they found their way into this one.

Then again, maybe they do belong in “Friends With Benefits.” Jenkins’ parts are as close as the movie gets to being a romantic comedy that truly breaks the rules of romantic comedies. The movie ends with a big dramatic movieish confrontation in a major New York City landmark, and though it’s couched as a critique of a similar scene in a bad rom-com, it’s still pretty clearly a fantasy.

Maybe verisimilitude isn’t what we want from rom-coms after all. Jamie may not like these movies, but she watches them anyway, even wishing on more than one occasion that that her life was like a movie. Perhaps we don’t need authentic rom-coms, just better ones, with more attention to detail, more charismatic stars, and smarter characters that give us the feeling, if not the reality, of being in love.

Watch More
FrankAndLamar_100-Trailer_MPX-1920×1080

Bro and Tell

BFFs And Night Court For Sports

Bromance and Comeuppance On Two New Comedy Crib Series

Posted by on

“Silicon Valley meets Girls meets black male educators with lots of unrealized potential.”

That’s how Carl Foreman Jr. and Anthony Gaskins categorize their new series Frank and Lamar which joins Joe Schiappa’s Sport Court in the latest wave of new series available now on IFC’s Comedy Crib. To better acquaint you with the newbies, we went right to the creators for their candid POVs. And they did not disappoint. Here are snippets of their interviews:

Frank and Lamar

via GIPHY

IFC: How would you describe Frank and Lamar to a fancy network executive you met in an elevator?
Carl: Best bros from college live and work together teaching at a fancy Manhattan private school, valiantly trying to transition into a more mature phase of personal and professional life while clinging to their boyish ways.

IFC: And to a friend of a friend you met in a bar?
Carl: The same way, slightly less coherent.

Anthony: I’d probably speak about it with much louder volume, due to the bar which would probably be playing the new Kendrick Lamar album. I might also include additional jokes about Carl, or unrelated political tangents.

Carl: He really delights in randomly slandering me for no reason. I get him back though. Our rapport on the page, screen, and in real life, comes out of a lot of that back and forth.

IFC: In what way is Frank and Lamar a poignant series for this moment in time?
Carl: It tells a story I feel most people aren’t familiar with, having young black males teach in a very affluent white world, while never making it expressly about that either. Then in tackling their personal lives, we see these three-dimensional guys navigate a pivotal moment in time from a perspective I feel mainstream audiences tend not to see portrayed.

Anthony: I feel like Frank and Lamar continues to push the envelope within the genre by presenting interesting and non stereotypical content about people of color. The fact that this show brought together so many talented creative people, from the cast and crew to the producers, who believe in the project, makes the work that much more intentional and truthful. I also think it’s pretty incredible that we got to employ many of our friends!

Sport Court

Sport Court gavel

IFC: How would you describe Sport Court to a fancy network executive you met in an elevator?
Joe: SPORT COURT follows Judge David Linda, a circuit court judge assigned to handle an ad hoc courtroom put together to prosecute rowdy fan behavior in the basement of the Hartford Ultradome. Think an updated Night Court.

IFC: How would you describe Sport Court to drunk friend of a friend you met in a bar?
Joe: Remember when you put those firecrackers down that guy’s pants at the baseball game? It’s about a judge who works in a court in the stadium that puts you in jail right then and there. I know, you actually did spend the night in jail, but imagine you went to court right that second and didn’t have to get your brother to take off work from GameStop to take you to your hearing.

IFC: Is there a method to your madness when coming up with sports fan faux pas?
Joe: I just think of the worst things that would ruin a sporting event for everyone. Peeing in the slushy machine in open view of a crowd seemed like a good one.

IFC: Honestly now, how many of the fan transgressions are things you’ve done or thought about doing?
Joe: I’ve thought about ripping out a whole row of chairs at a theater or stadium, so I would have my own private space. I like to think of that really whenever I have to sit crammed next to lots of people. Imagine the leg room!

Check out the full seasons of Frank and Lamar and Sport Court now on IFC’s Comedy Crib.

Watch More
Brockmire-103-banner-4

Millennial Wisdom

Charles Speaks For Us All

Get to know Charles, the social media whiz of Brockmire.

Posted by on

He may be an unlikely radio producer Brockmire, but Charles is #1 when it comes to delivering quips that tie a nice little bow on the absurdity of any given situation.

Charles also perfectly captures the jaded outlook of Millennials. Or at least Millennials as mythologized by marketers and news idiots. You know who you are.

Played superbly by Tyrel Jackson Williams, Charles’s quippy nuggets target just about any subject matter, from entry-level jobs in social media (“I plan on getting some experience here, then moving to New York to finally start my life.”) to the ramifications of fictional celebrity hookups (“Drake and Taylor Swift are dating! Albums y’all!”). But where he really nails the whole Millennial POV thing is when he comments on America’s second favorite past-time after type II diabetes: baseball.

Here are a few pearls.

On Baseball’s Lasting Cultural Relevance

“Baseball’s one of those old-timey things you don’t need anymore. Like cursive. Or email.”

On The Dramatic Value Of Double-Headers

“The only thing dumber than playing two boring-ass baseball games in one day is putting a two-hour delay between the boring-ass games.”

On Sartorial Tradition

“Is dressing badly just a thing for baseball, because that would explain his jacket.”

On Baseball, In A Nutshell

“Baseball is a f-cked up sport, and I want you to know it.”


Learn more about Charles in the behind-the-scenes video below.

And if you were born before the late ’80s and want to know what the kids think about Baseball, watch Brockmire Wednesdays at 10P on IFC.

Watch More
Brockmire_101_tout_2

Crown Jules

Amanda Peet FTW on Brockmire

Amanda Peet brings it on Brockmire Wednesday at 10P on IFC.

Posted by on
GIFS via Giphy

On Brockmire, Jules is the unexpected yin to Jim Brockmire’s yang. Which is saying a lot, because Brockmire’s yang is way out there. Played by Amanda Peet, Jules is hard-drinking, truth-spewing, baseball-loving…everything Brockmire is, and perhaps what he never expected to encounter in another human.

“We’re the same level of functional alcoholic.”


But Jules takes that commonality and transforms it into something special: a new beginning. A new beginning for failing minor league baseball team “The Frackers”, who suddenly about-face into a winning streak; and a new beginning for Brockmire, whose life gets a jumpstart when Jules lures him back to baseball. As for herself, her unexpected connection with Brockmire gives her own life a surprising and much needed goose.

“You’re a Goddamn Disaster and you’re starting To look good to me.”

This palpable dynamic adds depth and complexity to the narrative and pushes the series far beyond expected comedy. See for yourself in this behind-the-scenes video (and brace yourself for a unforgettable description of Brockmire’s genitals)…

Want more about Amanda Peet? She’s all over the place, and has even penned a recent self-reflective piece in the New York Times.

And of course you can watch the Jim-Jules relationship hysterically unfold in new episodes of Brockmire, every Wednesday at 10PM on IFC.

Watch More
Powered by ZergNet