This browser is supported only in Windows 10 and above.

DID YOU READ

Author Harold Goldberg Explains How “All Your Base Are Belong to Us”

Harold-Goldberg-book-cover-crop

Posted by on

There’s no denying the level of cultural impact video games have had in the last decade or so. Movies ache to look like them, businesses want to ape game mechanics for loyalty and profit and even book publishing‘s trying to tap into the creative energy of a medium once derided as disposable.

So, how did video game get to be such an electric vector in our lives and imaginations? That’s exactly the question that Harold Goldberg sets out to answer in his new book, “All Your Base Are Belong to Us.” Goldberg’s worked on both the game-making and critic sides of the medium and he digs deep into video game history to draw out the personalities responsible for the culture’s seismic shifts. Whether it’s the brashness of the early Atari days to the many unsung teenage geniuses that turned ideas into experience to the MMO revolution, Goldberg shows how the incandescent passion stoked by video games can warm hearts and burn lives.

Goldberg–also a music journalist and poet–answered some question about his book and how video games’ past may influence the medium’s future.

Do you think there’s more or less hucksterism than in the early days of the medium? Or is it just that the nature of the salesmanship has changed? Do you hink video games as a medium still need people like Atari co-founder Nolan Bushnell or EA founder Trip Hawkins to proselytize about video games?

There’s much more hucksterism in today’s industry. But it’s far more refined, savvier, sometime subtler and occasionally more insidious. In the early days, there was bloviating on the parts of a handful of wild-west-style, self-made entrepreneurs. They’d stretch the truth. They’d lie. Those who worked for them said they sold their souls. Today, the hucksterism trickles down to journalists and fans from the producers who demo games, from the tightly controlled release of snippets of games, like trailers. And tweets, too. It’s somehow less soulful that the supposedly soulless snake oil salesmen in the early days. Yet it’s more informative and more effective and often more annoying.

Harold Goldberg book cover.jpgIt seems like part of your goal in “All Your Base” is to illuminate some of the personalities who’ve created and continue to create powerful gaming experiences. Do you feel like perception of the medium would’ve been different if names and faces were attached to the early systems and games?

I think it’s always important to attach a human face to a creative work. Marketing departments made Bill Gates the creative genius behind something as boring as an operating system. Nintendo did bring out Miyamoto to talk about Mario and Zelda games. But they brought him to gaming magazines, not to general interest magazines. And, while he tells a brilliant story, there was a language problem as well. The medium back then was considered one step up from being toys. That’s changing only now. And it’s still a long hard slog. Anecdotally, as a journalist, it’s much easier to get an assignment about music or movies than it is about games. Games still frighten the media elite just as comics did a couple of generations ago.

What was the most surprising anecdote or bit of research you came across in working on the book?

There were so many. I loved the fact that “Crash Bandicoot”‘s working title Sonic’s Ass. Oh, and Dan Houser almost came to blows with Burt Reynolds during the taping of an audio segment for “Grand Theft Auto: Vice City.” But what was most surprising was that Ralph Baer, the maker of the Magnavox Odyssey, envisioned nearly all the kinds of games we have today, including downloadable games and wireless gaming — back in the 1970s.

Even today, in an age where creatives of all stripes are so media-savvy, lots of game designers eschew the spotlight. Why do you think that is?

If you’re the sensitive type, what people might ask you and what people might say to you could be devastating. It could cause a block, the inability to finish work on a project. It’s important sometimes to let the work speak for itself.

Is it fair to say there hasn’t been a lot of mentorship in the games business? Why not?

I think I do see mentorship. I certainly saw it when I worked at Sony Online. Jade Raymond and Ben Bell and I learned a lot about games from the people who had been in the industry before us. Of course, there were some real jerks there, too. There always are jerks. But the powers that are need to do more to mentor. They need to get into the schools. At the very least, they need to tell kids of the opportunities. Even making the informative videos on the Game Developers Conference site known to far more people would be a step in the right direction.

Do you think it was Shigeru Miyamoto’s fascination with the natural world that fueled his creativity?

He was influenced by manga, films like “Alice in Wonderland” and cartoons like “Popeye.” But he was utterly entranced by the wonders and curiosities of nature–lakes, caves, mountains, insects, horses, all animals. He retains that childlike sense of wonder to this day.

I’ve always felt that Rockstar Games is one of the few auteurs in the video game business. What do you feel it is about that particular collective of people that makes their games feel so well directed?

They seem to care passionately about every detail. And they care about putting a lot of game on a disk for the $60 you spend. Certainly, Sam Houser does. And it trickles down from him to the rest of the company. Even more, they have a deep curiosity about all other forms of culture, low and high. You can see it in “Red Dead Redemption.” In the New York Times, Fred Armisen called “Red Dead” a form of art. I have to agree. I was recently called ‘illiterate’ by a writer for espousing that point of view. But if you can call some film art and if you can call some forms of pop music art, why can’t you call “Red Dead” or “BioShock” or “Mass Effect 2” artful? They certainly capture the very essence of film and music — and give you much more.

Harold Goldberg.jpgWhat lessons do you think game creators and larger business entities have learned about the medium? What do you think they’ve ignored at their peril?

After 1983’s great gaming recession, game makers and game publishers learned to be more agile. They’ve learned to make games that are easy to play but hard to master. But some still haven’t learned that licensing a product from another industry won’t necessarily guarantee success. A great game may guarantee success. And sometimes, even that isn’t the case. Finally, there’s publisher hubris. I have yet to see a publisher that also makes hardware that was on top of the heap that didn’t somehow believe that they could never fail. And once they believe that, the fall is often quick and painful.

Do you see any links between the explosion of the games industry into the home and arcade markets of yesteryear and the proliferation of indie games hitting mobile devices today?

Yes! I see the same entrepreneurial spirit and the same genius and creativity in games like “Papa Sangre,” “Angry Birds” and “Infinity Blade.” And there are so many more, as you well know.

At 50 years old, video games still struggle at tapping into the psychic energy around big existential motivators like death, sex and parenthood? What games do you feel tackle them in interesting ways?

I think they do deal with them. “The Sims” does. “Undead Nightmare” DLC for “Red Dead Redemption” dealt with death through a lowly Sasquatch, a fantasy beast, in a real way that nearly moved me to tears. And I bet the people who cared about “Babysitting Mama” (it wasn’t me), would say that was a kind of semi-salient parenting experience. But I know what you’re really getting at. Games deal well with emotions that are black and white. It’s the grey areas, the subtleties of relationships and daily circumstances that are more complex than merely comic or tragic, that they really need to work on.

IFC_FOD_TV_long_haired_businessmen_table

Hacked In

Funny or Die Is Taking Over

FOD TV comes to IFC every Saturday night.

Posted by on

via GIPHY

We’ve been fans of Funny or Die since we first met The Landlord. That enduring love makes it more than logical, then, that IFC is totally cool with FOD hijacking the airwaves every Saturday night. Yes, that’s happening.

The appropriately titled FOD TV looks like something pulled from public access television in the nineties. Like lo-fi broken-antenna reception and warped VHS tapes. Equal parts WTF and UHF.

Get ready for characters including The Shirtless Painter, Long-Haired Businessmen, and Pigeon Man. They’re aptly named, but for a better sense of what’s in store, here’s a taste of ASMR with Kelly Whispers:

Watch FOD TV every Saturday night during IFC’s regularly scheduled movies.

SAE_102_tout_2

Wicked Good

See More Evil

Stan Against Evil Season 1 is on Hulu.

Posted by on
GIFs via Giphy

Okay, so you missed the entire first season of Stan Against Evil. There’s no shame in that, per se. But here’s the thing: Season 2 is just around the corner and you don’t want to lag behind. After all, Season 1 had some critical character development, not to mention countless plot twists, and a breathless finale cliffhanger that’s been begging for resolution since last fall. It also had this:

via GIPHY

The good news is that you can catch up right now on Hulu. Phew. But if you aren’t streaming yet, here’s a basic primer…

Willards Mill Is Evil

Stan spent his whole career as sheriff oblivious to the fact that his town has a nasty curse. Mostly because his recently-deceased wife was secretly killing demons and keeping Stan alive.

Demons Really Want To Kill Stan

The curse on Willards Mill stipulates that damned souls must hunt and kill each and every town sheriff, or “constable.” Oh, and these demons are shockingly creative.

via GIPHY

They Also Want To Kill Evie

Why? Because Evie’s a sheriff too, and the curse on Willard’s Mill doesn’t have a “one at a time” clause. Bummer, Evie.

Stan and Evie Must Work Together

Beating the curse will take two, baby, but that’s easier said than done because Stan doesn’t always seem to give a damn. Damn!

via GIPHY

Beware of Goats

It goes without saying for anyone who’s seen the show: If you know that ancient evil wants to kill you, be wary of anything that has cloven feet.

via GIPHY

Season 2 Is Lurking

Scary new things are slouching towards Willards Mill. An impending darkness descending on Stan, Evie and their cohort – eviler evil, more demony demons, and whatnot. And if Stan wants to survive, he’ll have to get even Stanlier.

Stan Against Evil Season 1 is now streaming right now on Hulu.

IFC_ComedyCrib_ThePlaceWeLive_SeriesImage_web

SO EXCITED!!!

Reminders that the ’90s were a thing

"The Place We Live" is available for a Jessie Spano-level binge on Comedy Crib.

Posted by on
GIFs via Giphy

Unless you stopped paying attention to the world at large in 1989, you are of course aware that the ’90s are having their pop cultural second coming. Nobody is more acutely aware of this than Dara Katz and Betsy Kenney, two comedians who met doing improv comedy and have just made their Comedy Crib debut with the hilarious ’90s TV throwback series, The Place We Live.

IFC: How would you describe “The Place We Live” to a fancy network executive you just met in an elevator?

Dara: It’s everything you loved–or loved to hate—from Melrose Place and 90210 but condensed to five minutes, funny (on purpose) and totally absurd.

IFC: How would you describe “The Place We Live” to a drunk friend of a friend you met in a bar?

Betsy: “Hey Todd, why don’t you have a sip of water. Also, I think you’ll love The Place We Live because everyone has issues…just like you, Todd.”

via GIPHY

IFC: When you were living through the ’90s, did you think it was television’s golden age or the pop culture apocalypse?


Betsy: I wasn’t sure I knew what it was, I just knew I loved it!


Dara: Same. Was just happy that my parents let me watch. But looking back, the ’90s honored The Teen. And for that, it’s the golden age of pop culture. 

IFC: Which ’90s shows did you mine for the series, and why?

Betsy: Melrose and 90210 for the most part. If you watch an episode of either of those shows you’ll see they’re a comedic gold mine. In one single episode, they cover serious crimes, drug problems, sex and working in a law firm and/or gallery, all while being young, hot and skinny.


Dara: And almost any series we were watching in the ’90s, Full House, Saved By the Bell, My So Called Life has very similar themes, archetypes and really stupid-intense drama. We took from a lot of places. 

via GIPHY

IFC: How would you describe each of the show’s characters in terms of their ’90s TV stereotype?

Dara: Autumn (Sunita Mani) is the femme fatale. Robin (Dara Katz) is the book worm (because she wears glasses). Candace (Betsy Kenney) is Corey’s twin and gives great advice and has really great hair. Corey (Casey Jost) is the boy next door/popular guy. Candace and Corey’s parents decided to live in a car so the gang can live in their house. 
Lee (Jonathan Braylock) is the jock.

IFC: Why do you think the world is ready for this series?

Dara: Because everyone’s feeling major ’90s nostalgia right now, and this is that, on steroids while also being a totally new, silly thing.

Delight in the whole season of The Place We Live right now on IFC’s Comedy Crib. It’ll take you back in all the right ways.