DID YOU READ

3D Projectors Might Be Ruining 2D Movies

3D Projectors Might Be Ruining 2D Movies (photo)

Posted by on

Yesterday’s Boston Globe had a frankly horrifying piece from film critic by Ty Burr about the impact of 3D projectors on 2D projection in Boston. Burr found that 8 of the 19 screens at a local AMC multiplex on a mid-April evening were presenting “gloomy, underlit images.” He eventually discovered the culprit was a particular brand of projector — a 4K digital model by Sony — that requires an external lens adapter to exhibit 3D films. If you leave that 3D lens on during 2D movies, as Burr found was the habit in certain Boston theaters, the result is an image that, according to one expert, can be “85 percent darker than a properly projected film.”

I encourage anyone who regularly visits multiplexes to read Burr’s entire piece. Though he got a few union projectionists to talk anonymously about the problem, he found the multiplexes themselves rather apathetic about the issue. The National Amusements chain claims they’ve had no problems with the Sony 4K, Regal Cinemas responded with a statement claiming their patrons like digital cinema in general, and AMC, the company that prompted Burr’s piece, essentially said they have no corporate policy in place regarding the proper use of these 4K projectors. That means it’s up to your local theater to figure out how to use these machines properly, or to spend the time and money required to switch out the 3D lens when it’s not in use. Looking for a red flag? Next time you’re watching a digitally-projected 2D movie at the multiplex, and the night scenes look extra murky, you might want to consider bringing it to the attention of the management. Burr also recommends you take a look back at the projection booth if you’re suspicious of the image quality. He says “if you see two beams of light, one stacked on top of the other, that’s a Sony with the 3-D lens still in place. If there’s a single beam, it’s either a Sony with the 3-D lens removed or a different brand of digital projector, such as Christie or Barco.”

Perhaps the most disheartening thing about Burr’s piece isn’t the widespread dim image quality — that’s a battle that’s been fought for decades, long before 3D adapters were the problem — but that the total lack of concern on the part of the movie theaters is echoed by the customers he interviewed. Polling a few patrons exiting a movie that was clearly misprojected, Burr found mostly disinterest in the issue. “An older couple leaving the under-illuminated 7:15 ‘Win Win’ showing thought the film looked fine,” he wrote. “Another patron praised its ‘creative lighting.'”

One could argue this is making a three-dimensional mountain out of a two-dimensional molehill. If these customers feel like they got their money’s worth, why complain? Because to not complain is to accept mediocrity. It’s true: it’s tough to know whether a movie is being properly projected. Most of us are seeing the movie for the first time; so how can we tell if it looks right? We put our trust in the theater to protect us. Burr’s article suggests they may need to do more to earn that trust.

Here’s the crazy thing about the general shoulder shrugging Burr got when he asked movie theater chains about this problem: it’s in their best interest to give their customers the finest experience they can possibly have. These companies are under assault from all sides. Movie studios are considering shortened video on demand windows. Customers have better home theaters. The folks who do buy tickets spend the entire movie talking and texting on their cell phones. The quality of the theatrical experience should be the exhibitors’ number one priority; if I want to watch a crummy looking version of a movie in depressing surroundings, I can wait a few months and watch it at home on my tiny SD television. If I’m going to get a similarly frustrating experience for fifteen bucks, why pay? I’m a dim guy, but I’m not that stupid.

Watch More
Brockmire-103-banner-4

Millennial Wisdom

Charles Speaks For Us All

Get to know Charles, the social media whiz of Brockmire.

Posted by on

He may be an unlikely radio producer Brockmire, but Charles is #1 when it comes to delivering quips that tie a nice little bow on the absurdity of any given situation.

Charles also perfectly captures the jaded outlook of Millennials. Or at least Millennials as mythologized by marketers and news idiots. You know who you are.

Played superbly by Tyrel Jackson Williams, Charles’s quippy nuggets target just about any subject matter, from entry-level jobs in social media (“I plan on getting some experience here, then moving to New York to finally start my life.”) to the ramifications of fictional celebrity hookups (“Drake and Taylor Swift are dating! Albums y’all!”). But where he really nails the whole Millennial POV thing is when he comments on America’s second favorite past-time after type II diabetes: baseball.

Here are a few pearls.

On Baseball’s Lasting Cultural Relevance

“Baseball’s one of those old-timey things you don’t need anymore. Like cursive. Or email.”

On The Dramatic Value Of Double-Headers

“The only thing dumber than playing two boring-ass baseball games in one day is putting a two-hour delay between the boring-ass games.”

On Sartorial Tradition

“Is dressing badly just a thing for baseball, because that would explain his jacket.”

On Baseball, In A Nutshell

“Baseball is a f-cked up sport, and I want you to know it.”


Learn more about Charles in the behind-the-scenes video below.

And if you were born before the late ’80s and want to know what the kids think about Baseball, watch Brockmire Wednesdays at 10P on IFC.

Watch More
Brockmire_101_tout_2

Crown Jules

Amanda Peet FTW on Brockmire

Amanda Peet brings it on Brockmire Wednesday at 10P on IFC.

Posted by on
GIFS via Giphy

On Brockmire, Jules is the unexpected yin to Jim Brockmire’s yang. Which is saying a lot, because Brockmire’s yang is way out there. Played by Amanda Peet, Jules is hard-drinking, truth-spewing, baseball-loving…everything Brockmire is, and perhaps what he never expected to encounter in another human.

“We’re the same level of functional alcoholic.”


But Jules takes that commonality and transforms it into something special: a new beginning. A new beginning for failing minor league baseball team “The Frackers”, who suddenly about-face into a winning streak; and a new beginning for Brockmire, whose life gets a jumpstart when Jules lures him back to baseball. As for herself, her unexpected connection with Brockmire gives her own life a surprising and much needed goose.

“You’re a Goddamn Disaster and you’re starting To look good to me.”

This palpable dynamic adds depth and complexity to the narrative and pushes the series far beyond expected comedy. See for yourself in this behind-the-scenes video (and brace yourself for a unforgettable description of Brockmire’s genitals)…

Want more about Amanda Peet? She’s all over the place, and has even penned a recent self-reflective piece in the New York Times.

And of course you can watch the Jim-Jules relationship hysterically unfold in new episodes of Brockmire, every Wednesday at 10PM on IFC.

Watch More
Brockmire-Sam-Adams-great-effing-beer

Draught Pick

Sam Adams “Keeps It Brockmire”

All New Brockmire airs Wednesdays at 10P on IFC.

Posted by on

From baseball to beer, Jim Brockmire calls ’em like he sees ’em.

via GIPHY

It’s no wonder at all, then, that Sam Adams would reach out to Brockmire to be their shockingly-honest (and inevitably short-term) new spokesperson. Unscripted and unrestrained, he’ll talk straight about Sam—and we’ll take his word. Check out this new testimonial for proof:

See more Brockmire Wednesdays at 10P on IFC, presented by Samuel Adams. Good f***** beer.

Watch More
Powered by ZergNet