Alfred Hitchock Never Read the Novel “Psycho”

Alfred Hitchock Never Read the Novel “Psycho” (photo)

Posted by on

“Hitchcock” by Francois Truffaut was one of the very first books about film I ever bought, the summer after my junior year of high school. I read it over and over. I practically memorized parts of it. I’ve still got my copy: it’s yellowed and frayed, the way a great book should look. If you haven’t read it — well if you haven’t read it you need to get a freaking copy right now. But the book is a lengthy interview of Alfred Hitchcock conducted by Truffaut in 1962, in which the French critic and director lays out his theories about Hitchcock’s work, and Hitchcock responds with his own thoughts and anecdotes about his storied career. It’s awesome: funny, insightful, and a truly illuminating work of film criticism. This book literally changed my life when I was 16. I started looking at Hitchcock’s work — and all films — differently. The subtitle calls it “The definitive study of Alfred Hitchcock.” I don’t disagree.

So I beyond excited to find that Filmdetail had linked to MP3s of Truffaut’s original audio files from his conversations with Hitchcock. Over on their site you can listen to (or download!) twenty-five different half-hour long chunks of their conversation, including portions on “Notorious” and “The Birds.” That’s over twelve hours of audio. It’s like the greatest podcast series in history, made some thirty five years before the invention of podcasting.

I’m going to listen to the whole thing, but just to get a taste, I turned on the segment on “Psycho” and read along with my copy of “Hitchcock” by Truffaut. Viewed and listened to side-by-side, you get to see how much Truffaut massaged the manuscript to make the conversation flow more naturally — because he didn’t speak English, the entire 12.5 hours were conducted through translator Helen G. Scott — and even where he fleshed out or completely changed his own comments. For example, on page 282, Truffaut asks Hitchcock “Would you say that ‘Psycho’ is an experimental film?” to which Hitchcock provides his very famous answer about the fact that when he made “Psycho” he didn’t care about the acting or the subject matter, merely the fact that he was able to evoke a physical response in the audience (“They were aroused by pure film.”) But the original audio reveals that Truffaut didn’t ask about experimental film at all. What he really asked (at around the 24 minutes mark) was “Do you have anything else to say about ‘Psycho?'” In other words, Hitchcock didn’t come to that incredibly famous description of his film over the course of the conversation; he had it fully formed in his mind already and was simply waiting for the opportunity to share it!

My other favorite moment is this exchange from the very beginning of that same conversation about “Psycho” (obviously the emphasis added is mine):

Francois Truffaut: I read the novel, “Psycho,” which I thought was, frankly, very poor. In fact, worse than bad. In fact, I am surprised it was even written at all. It’s so absurd and even almost dishonest, since there are constant descriptions of Norman sitting down next to his mother and talking to her. And this convention works very well in cinema and not at all in a novel. Isn’t that your opinion?”

Alfred Hitchcock: Sure. Well I probably — you see, when I look for an idea sometimes I read the novel right through and sometimes I don’t. I don’t think I ever read that thing.

FT: Someone gave you a reading of it?

AH: Yes. Or I might have read it very quickly once, that’s all. And never looked at it again.

FT: But what attracted you to this one then?

AH: I think the murder in the bathtub coming out of the blue.

I’d love to see a “Harry Potter” fans reaction to that statement. And I can only imagine what other fascinating tidbits the rest of the conversations contain. All I need is, like, a twelve hour subway ride to find out.

Watch More

Hard Out

Comedy From The Closet

Janice and Jeffrey Available Now On IFC's Comedy Crib

Posted by on

She’s been referred to as “the love child of Amy Sedaris and Tracy Ullman,” and he’s a self-described “Italian who knows how to cook a great spaghetti alla carbonara.” They’re Mollie Merkel and Matteo Lane, prolific indie comedians who blended their robust creative juices to bring us the new Comedy Crib series Janice and Jeffrey. Mollie and Matteo took time to answer our probing questions about their series and themselves. Here’s a taste.


IFC: How would you describe Janice and Jeffrey to a fancy network executive you met in an elevator?

Mollie & Matteo: Janice and Jeffrey is about a married couple experiencing intimacy issues but who don’t have a clue it’s because they are gay. Their oblivion makes them even more endearing.  Their total lack of awareness provides for a buffet of comedy.

IFC: What’s your origin story? How did you two people meet and how long have you been working together?

Mollie: We met at a dive bar in Wrigley Field Chicago. It was a show called Entertaining Julie… It was a cool variety scene with lots of talented people. I was doing Janice one night and Matteo was doing an impression of Liza Minnelli. We sort of just fell in love with each other’s… ACT! Matteo made the first move and told me how much he loved Janice and I drove home feeling like I just met someone really special.

IFC: How would Janice describe Jeffrey?

Mollie: “He can paint, cook homemade Bolognese, and sing Opera. Not to mention he has a great body. He makes me feel empowered and free. He doesn’t suffocate me with attention so our love has room to breath.”

IFC: How would Jeffrey describe Janice?

Matteo: “Like a Ford. Built to last.”

IFC: Why do you think the world is ready for this series?

Mollie & Matteo: Our current political world is mirroring and reflecting this belief that homosexuality is wrong. So what better time for satire. Everyone is so pro gay and equal rights, which is of course what we want, too. But no one is looking at middle America and people actually in the closet. No one is saying, hey this is really painful and tragic, and sitting with that. Having compassion but providing the desperate relief of laughter…This seemed like the healthiest, best way to “fight” the gay rights “fight”.

IFC: Hummus is hilarious. Why is it so funny?

Mollie: It just seems like something people take really seriously, which is funny to me. I started to see it in a lot of lesbians’ refrigerators at a time. It’s like observing a lesbian in a comfortable shoe. It’s a language we speak. Pass the Hummus. Turn on the Indigo Girls would ya?

See the whole season of Janice and Jeffrey right now on IFC’s Comedy Crib.

Watch More

Die Hard Dads

Inspiration For Die Hard Dads

Die Hard is on IFC all Father's Day Long

Posted by on
Photo Credit: Everett Collection, GIPHY

Yippee ki-yay, everybody! It’s time to celebrate the those most literal of mother-effers: dads!

And just in case the title of this post left anything to the imagination, IFC is giving dads balls-to-the-wall ’80s treatment with a glorious marathon of action trailblazer Die Hard.

There are so many things we could say about Die Hard. We could talk about how it was comedian Bruce Willis’s first foray into action flicks, or Alan Rickman’s big screen debut. But dads don’t give a sh!t about that stuff.

No, dads just want to fantasize that they could be deathproof quip factory John McClane in their own mundane lives. So while you celebrate the fathers in your life, consider how John McClane would respond to these traditional “dad” moments…

Wedding Toasts

Dads always struggle to find the right words of welcome to extend to new family. John McClane, on the other hand, is the master of inclusivity.
Die Hard wedding

Using Public Restrooms

While nine out of ten dads would rather die than use a disgusting public bathroom, McClane isn’t bothered one bit. So long as he can fit a bloody foot in the sink, he’s G2G.
Die Hard restroom

Awkward Dancing

Because every dad needs a signature move.
Die Hard dance

Writing Thank You Notes

It can be hard for dads to express gratitude. Not only can McClane articulate his thanks, he makes it feel personal.
Die Hard thank you

Valentine’s Day

How would John McClane say “I heart you” in a way that ain’t cliche? The image speaks for itself.
Die Hard valentines


The only thing most dads hate more than shopping is fielding eleventh-hour phone calls with additional items for the list. But does McClane throw a typical man-tantrum? Nope. He finds the words to express his feelings like a goddam adult.
Die Hard thank you

Last Minute Errands

John McClane knows when a fight isn’t worth fighting.
Die Hard errands

Sneaking Out Of The Office Early

What is this, high school? Make a real exit, dads.
Die Hard office

Think you or your dad could stand to be more like Bruce? Role model fodder abounds in the Die Hard marathon all Father’s Day long on IFC.

Watch More

Founding Farters

Know Your Nerd History

Revenge of the Nerds is on IFC.

Posted by on
Photo Credit: Everett Collection, GIFs via Giphy

That we live in the heyday of nerds is no hot secret. Scientists are celebrities, musicians are robots and late night hosts can recite every word of the Silmarillion. It’s too easy to think that it’s always been this way. But the truth is we owe much to our nerd forebearers who toiled through the jock-filled ’80s so that we might take over the world.


Our humble beginnings are perhaps best captured in iconic ’80s romp Revenge of the Nerds. Like the founding fathers of our Country, the titular nerds rose above their circumstances to culturally pave the way for every Colbert and deGrasse Tyson that we know and love today.

To make sure you’re in the know about our very important cultural roots, here’s a quick download of the vengeful nerds without whom our shameful stereotypes might never have evolved.

Lewis Skolnick

The George Washington of nerds whose unflappable optimism – even in the face of humiliating self-awareness – basically gave birth to the Geek Pride movement.

Gilbert Lowe

OK, this guy is wet blanket, but an important wet blanket. Think Aaron Burr to Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Hamilton. His glass-mostly-empty attitude is a galvanizing force for Lewis. Who knows if Lewis could have kept up his optimism without Lowe’s Debbie-Downer outlook?

Arnold Poindexter

A music nerd who, after a soft start (inside joke, you’ll get it later), came out of his shell and let his passion lead instead of his anxiety. If you played an instrument (specifically, electric violin), and you were a nerd, this was your patron saint.


A sex-loving, blunt-smoking, nose-picking guitar hero. If you don’t think he sounds like a classic nerd, you’re absolutely right. And that’s the whole point. Along with Lamar, he simultaneously expanded the definition of nerd and gave pre-existing nerds a twisted sort of cred by association.

Lamar Latrell

Black, gay, and a crazy good breakdancer. In other words, a total groundbreaker. He proved to the world that nerds don’t have a single mold, but are simply outcasts waiting for their moment.


Exceedingly stupid, this dumbass was monumental because he (in a sequel) leaves the jocks to become a nerd. Totally unheard of back then. Now all jocks are basically nerds.

Well, there they are. Never forget that we stand on their shoulders.

Revenge of the Nerds is on IFC all month long.

Watch More
Powered by ZergNet