This browser is supported only in Windows 10 and above.


Your Adequacy.

Posted by on

The man who would have been president.
Tired and under the weather last week, we skipped a screening of Davis Guggenheim‘s "An Inconvenient Truth," grumbling something about the doc being presented to the public as the equivalent of "cinematic spinach" (and the counter of how many people have "pledged to see the truth" at the top of the official site ain’t helping that impression). Andrea Meyer, one of IFC News writers, tossed that back in our face with a piece that is entirely a direct appeal to the public to see the film. Now, in light of that and other recent press, we stand thoroughly chastised…yes, "An Inconvenient Truth" is Very Important, and we didn’t go, and we Feel Bad. Honestly. Those are not capitalizations of irony.

And see the company we’ve unknowingly kept? James Gerstenzang in the LA Times:

President Bush had a two-word response when he was asked Monday whether he would see Al Gore‘s documentary on global warming.

"Doubt it," the president said during an appearance before the National Restaurant Assn. in Chicago.

And there’s already controversy: via Ray Pride at Movie City Indie, this item from

Sterling Burnett is a senior fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis, an organization that has received over $390,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998… On Fox, Burnett compared [Gore’s] movie… to watching a movie by Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels to learn about Nazi Germany… "That’s the problem. If I thought Al Gore’s movie was as you like to say, fair and balanced, I’d say, everyone should go see it. But why go see propaganda? You don’t go see Joseph Goebbels’ films to see the truth about Nazi Germany. You don’t go see Al Gore’s films to see the truth about global warming," Mr. Burnett asserts. "Burnett recently wrote an editorial defending former Exxon CEO Lee Raymond’s lavish compensation (which amounted to $190,000 a day in 2005). He failed to mention his financial connection to the company."

Oof for just the Goebbels reference alone! Elsewhere, as Linda Feldmann at the Christian Science Monitor writes that the doc, in which Gore apparently comes across as both funny and personable (if only! 2000!) "has set political tongues to wagging: Will he run for president again?" On the wires today, Gore’s said no. Well, no-ish.

"I have no plans to be a candidate, and no intention of being a candidate," Gore said in the interview broadcast on NBC’s "Today" show. But he added: "I’ve said I’m not at the stage of my life where I’m going to say never in the rest of my life will I ever think about such a thing."

David Poland‘s of the spinach argument: "Castor Oil is good for you (I hope), but that doesn’t make it taste any better. McDonald’s is bad for you, but that doesn’t make a large order of fries hot out of the animal fat any less delicious." At Slate, Gregg Easterbrook is inclined to agree he also writes that "The picture the movie paints is always worst-case scenario. Considering the multiple times Gore has given his greenhouse slide show (he says "thousands"), it’s jarring that the movie was not scrubbed for factual precision." He goes on to point out places where the film diverges from the scientific consensus, and wonders at the need for "disaster-movie speculation" when "the science-consensus forecast about sea-level rise is plenty bad enough." And Amanda Griscom Little at Salon looks in at the bipartisan Alliance for Climate Protection.

In an great post, AJ Schnack at All These Wonderful Things wonders if "what is essentially a multimedia lecture writ large can draw the audiences that Morgan Spurlock and Michael Moore have with their serio-comic muckraking or whether the public will view this as little more than a politico’s ego trip." He sums up much of the advance buzz on the film, and muses on how it will translate into ticket sales.

But enough of all this — to the reviews!

A.O. Scott in the New York Times: "[Gore] speaks of the need to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions as a ‘moral imperative,’ and most people who see this movie will do so out of a sense of duty, which seems to me entirely appropriate. Luckily, it happens to be a well-made documentary, edited crisply enough to keep it from feeling like 90 minutes of C-Span and shaped to give Mr. Gore’s argument a real sense of drama. As unsettling as it can be, it is also intellectually exhilarating, and, like any good piece of pedagogy, whets the appetite for further study. This is not everything you need to know about global warming: that’s the point. But it is a good place to start, and to continue, a process of education that could hardly be more urgent. ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ is a necessary film."

Rob Nelson at the Village Voice: "[W]henever Guggenheim departs from the show-and-tell to sketch the speaker’s motives, the film makes for compelling psychobiography despite the fact that Gore, stiff as an air-conditioned breeze at the Four Seasons, isn’t the least bit compelling himself."

David Edelstein at New York: " ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ is one of the most realistic documentaries I’ve ever seen—and, dry as it is, one of the most devastating in its implications. See it with your kids—and watch closely to see who attacks it and on what grounds. I differ with Gore only on his optimism. ‘Political will is a renewable resource,’ he says. There’s no accounting for people’s nutty faith."

Andrew O’Hehir at Salon: "I’d like to believe that a public figure can speak truth at this level — including the discourse-rotting fact that politicians of both parties are so stuffed with corporate money that they’ve preferred to ignore this issue — while remaining politically viable. But I’m not sure that’s possible now, if it ever was. Gore speaks hopefully of a time when America, by far the most wasteful nation in the world and the biggest contributor to global warming, will face this potentially devastating crisis with a little forthright Yankee techno-ingenuity. But that day, he admits, has not come yet and may not come soon."

+ COMMENTARY: See This Movie, Dammit! "An Inconvenient Truth" (IFC News)
+ President Doubts He’ll See Gore Film (LA Times)
+ An Inconvenient Truth: ExxonMobil has paid crickets comparing Al Gore to Nazis (Movie City Indie)
+ Gore back in the limelight, and setting off a buzz (Christian Science Monitor)
+ Gore limits campaigning to climate change (AP)
+ May 24, 2006 (The Hot Blog)
+ The moral flaws of Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth. (Slate)
+ "Global warming kills" (Salon)
+ Is Gore’s "Truth" the Next Doc Hit?
(All These Wonderful Things)
+ Warning of Calamities and Hoping for a Change in ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ (NY Times)
+ Fahrenheit 2050 (Village Voice)
+ Devastating in Its Implications (New York)
+ Hurricane Al (Salon)


Hacked In

Funny or Die Is Taking Over

FOD TV comes to IFC every Saturday night.

Posted by on


We’ve been fans of Funny or Die since we first met The Landlord. That enduring love makes it more than logical, then, that IFC is totally cool with FOD hijacking the airwaves every Saturday night. Yes, that’s happening.

The appropriately titled FOD TV looks like something pulled from public access television in the nineties. Like lo-fi broken-antenna reception and warped VHS tapes. Equal parts WTF and UHF.

Get ready for characters including The Shirtless Painter, Long-Haired Businessmen, and Pigeon Man. They’re aptly named, but for a better sense of what’s in store, here’s a taste of ASMR with Kelly Whispers:

Watch FOD TV every Saturday night during IFC’s regularly scheduled movies.


Wicked Good

See More Evil

Stan Against Evil Season 1 is on Hulu.

Posted by on
GIFs via Giphy

Okay, so you missed the entire first season of Stan Against Evil. There’s no shame in that, per se. But here’s the thing: Season 2 is just around the corner and you don’t want to lag behind. After all, Season 1 had some critical character development, not to mention countless plot twists, and a breathless finale cliffhanger that’s been begging for resolution since last fall. It also had this:


The good news is that you can catch up right now on Hulu. Phew. But if you aren’t streaming yet, here’s a basic primer…

Willards Mill Is Evil

Stan spent his whole career as sheriff oblivious to the fact that his town has a nasty curse. Mostly because his recently-deceased wife was secretly killing demons and keeping Stan alive.

Demons Really Want To Kill Stan

The curse on Willards Mill stipulates that damned souls must hunt and kill each and every town sheriff, or “constable.” Oh, and these demons are shockingly creative.


They Also Want To Kill Evie

Why? Because Evie’s a sheriff too, and the curse on Willard’s Mill doesn’t have a “one at a time” clause. Bummer, Evie.

Stan and Evie Must Work Together

Beating the curse will take two, baby, but that’s easier said than done because Stan doesn’t always seem to give a damn. Damn!


Beware of Goats

It goes without saying for anyone who’s seen the show: If you know that ancient evil wants to kill you, be wary of anything that has cloven feet.


Season 2 Is Lurking

Scary new things are slouching towards Willards Mill. An impending darkness descending on Stan, Evie and their cohort – eviler evil, more demony demons, and whatnot. And if Stan wants to survive, he’ll have to get even Stanlier.

Stan Against Evil Season 1 is now streaming right now on Hulu.



Reminders that the ’90s were a thing

"The Place We Live" is available for a Jessie Spano-level binge on Comedy Crib.

Posted by on
GIFs via Giphy

Unless you stopped paying attention to the world at large in 1989, you are of course aware that the ’90s are having their pop cultural second coming. Nobody is more acutely aware of this than Dara Katz and Betsy Kenney, two comedians who met doing improv comedy and have just made their Comedy Crib debut with the hilarious ’90s TV throwback series, The Place We Live.

IFC: How would you describe “The Place We Live” to a fancy network executive you just met in an elevator?

Dara: It’s everything you loved–or loved to hate—from Melrose Place and 90210 but condensed to five minutes, funny (on purpose) and totally absurd.

IFC: How would you describe “The Place We Live” to a drunk friend of a friend you met in a bar?

Betsy: “Hey Todd, why don’t you have a sip of water. Also, I think you’ll love The Place We Live because everyone has issues…just like you, Todd.”


IFC: When you were living through the ’90s, did you think it was television’s golden age or the pop culture apocalypse?

Betsy: I wasn’t sure I knew what it was, I just knew I loved it!

Dara: Same. Was just happy that my parents let me watch. But looking back, the ’90s honored The Teen. And for that, it’s the golden age of pop culture. 

IFC: Which ’90s shows did you mine for the series, and why?

Betsy: Melrose and 90210 for the most part. If you watch an episode of either of those shows you’ll see they’re a comedic gold mine. In one single episode, they cover serious crimes, drug problems, sex and working in a law firm and/or gallery, all while being young, hot and skinny.

Dara: And almost any series we were watching in the ’90s, Full House, Saved By the Bell, My So Called Life has very similar themes, archetypes and really stupid-intense drama. We took from a lot of places. 


IFC: How would you describe each of the show’s characters in terms of their ’90s TV stereotype?

Dara: Autumn (Sunita Mani) is the femme fatale. Robin (Dara Katz) is the book worm (because she wears glasses). Candace (Betsy Kenney) is Corey’s twin and gives great advice and has really great hair. Corey (Casey Jost) is the boy next door/popular guy. Candace and Corey’s parents decided to live in a car so the gang can live in their house. 
Lee (Jonathan Braylock) is the jock.

IFC: Why do you think the world is ready for this series?

Dara: Because everyone’s feeling major ’90s nostalgia right now, and this is that, on steroids while also being a totally new, silly thing.

Delight in the whole season of The Place We Live right now on IFC’s Comedy Crib. It’ll take you back in all the right ways.